On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 09:18:19AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:40:22PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 03:23:06PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 03:46:04AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > >
> > > > +void
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 09:18:19AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:40:22PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 03:23:06PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 03:46:04AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > >
> > > > +void
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:40:22PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 03:23:06PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 03:46:04AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> > > +void kcpustat_cputime(struct kernel_cpustat *kcpustat, int cpu,
> > > +
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 03:23:06PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 03:46:04AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > +void kcpustat_cputime(struct kernel_cpustat *kcpustat, int cpu,
> > + u64 *user, u64 *nice, u64 *system,
> > + u64 *guest, u
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 03:46:04AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> +void kcpustat_cputime(struct kernel_cpustat *kcpustat, int cpu,
> + u64 *user, u64 *nice, u64 *system,
> + u64 *guest, u64 *guest_nice)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *curr;
> + struct
Kcpustat is not correctly supported on nohz_full CPUs. The tick doesn't
fire and the cputime therefore doesn't move forward. The issue has shown
up after the vanishing of the remaining 1Hz which has made the issue
visible.
We are solving that with tracking the task running on a CPU through RCU
and
6 matches
Mail list logo
