On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 02:51:00PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 1/4/19 1:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Remote compaction is expensive and possibly counter-productive. Locality
> > is expected to often have better performance characteristics than remote
> > high-order pages. For small
On 1/4/19 1:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Remote compaction is expensive and possibly counter-productive. Locality
> is expected to often have better performance characteristics than remote
> high-order pages. For small allocations, it's expected that locality is
> generally required or fallbacks are
Remote compaction is expensive and possibly counter-productive. Locality
is expected to often have better performance characteristics than remote
high-order pages. For small allocations, it's expected that locality is
generally required or fallbacks are possible. For larger allocations such
as
3 matches
Mail list logo
