From: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 03:45:59 +0800
> if the table is always fixed size with MAX_LINKS entries, why not use a
> statically
> allocated table straightforwardly?
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I made the explicit decision to dynamically
From: Denis Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 03:45:59 +0800
if the table is always fixed size with MAX_LINKS entries, why not use a
statically
allocated table straightforwardly?
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I made the explicit decision to dynamically allocate
if the table is always fixed size with MAX_LINKS entries, why not use a
statically
allocated table straightforwardly?
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 11 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
if the table is always fixed size with MAX_LINKS entries, why not use a
statically
allocated table straightforwardly?
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 11 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
4 matches
Mail list logo