Em Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:11:17AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 12:58:35PM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> > > On 12/2/13, 12:38 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Why not just --event-time?
> > > Really should have dropped
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 12:58:35PM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> > On 12/2/13, 12:38 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >Can you suggest a better name for the option being discussed?
>
> > >Perhaps one of:
>
> > >--show-event-time
> > >--event-time
>
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@ghostprotocols.net wrote:
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 12:58:35PM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
On 12/2/13, 12:38 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Can you suggest a better name for the option being discussed?
Perhaps one of:
--show-event-time
Em Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:11:17AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@ghostprotocols.net wrote:
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 12:58:35PM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
On 12/2/13, 12:38 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Why not just --event-time?
Really should have
On 12/2/13, 1:17 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Probably, yeah, Ingo made some point about using --show- for some reason,
Ingo?
One I can think of is that, in general, plain --feature can mean, at
least, one of --enable-feature and --show-feature, so perhaps that is
the point.
But then,
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 12:58:35PM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 12/2/13, 12:38 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Can you suggest a better name for the option being discussed?
> >Perhaps one of:
> >--show-event-time
> >--event-time
> >?
>
> Why not just --event-time?
> Really
On 12/2/13, 12:38 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Can you suggest a better name for the option being discussed?
Perhaps one of:
--show-event-time
--event-time
?
Why not just --event-time?
Really should have dropped the 'show' from the recent perf-script change
(just --task-events and
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 12:25:26PM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 12/2/13, 12:23 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:38:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> >>2013-12-02 (월), 09:33 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
> >>>Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:53:19PM +0900,
On 12/2/13, 12:23 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:38:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
Hi Arnaldo,
2013-12-02 (월), 09:33 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:53:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
From: Namhyung Kim
The --show-time-info
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:38:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> 2013-12-02 (월), 09:33 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
> > Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:53:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > > From: Namhyung Kim
> > >
> > > The --show-time-info option is for displaying
Hi Arnaldo,
2013-12-02 (월), 09:33 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
> Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:53:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > From: Namhyung Kim
> >
> > The --show-time-info option is for displaying elapsed sampling time
>
> Isn't that too long? Can't we use just --time/-t?
Hmm..
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:53:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> From: Namhyung Kim
>
> The --show-time-info option is for displaying elapsed sampling time
Isn't that too long? Can't we use just --time/-t?
> information for each entry.
>
> $ perf record -- perf bench sched messaging
> $
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:53:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
The --show-time-info option is for displaying elapsed sampling time
Isn't that too long? Can't we use just --time/-t?
information for each entry.
$ perf record -- perf bench sched
Hi Arnaldo,
2013-12-02 (월), 09:33 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:53:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
The --show-time-info option is for displaying elapsed sampling time
Isn't that too long? Can't we use just
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:38:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
Hi Arnaldo,
2013-12-02 (월), 09:33 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:53:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
The --show-time-info option is for displaying
On 12/2/13, 12:23 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:38:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
Hi Arnaldo,
2013-12-02 (월), 09:33 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:53:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 12:25:26PM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
On 12/2/13, 12:23 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:38:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
2013-12-02 (월), 09:33 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:53:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim
On 12/2/13, 12:38 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Can you suggest a better name for the option being discussed?
Perhaps one of:
--show-event-time
--event-time
?
Why not just --event-time?
Really should have dropped the 'show' from the recent perf-script change
(just --task-events and
Em Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 12:58:35PM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
On 12/2/13, 12:38 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Can you suggest a better name for the option being discussed?
Perhaps one of:
--show-event-time
--event-time
?
Why not just --event-time?
Really should have dropped
On 12/2/13, 1:17 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Probably, yeah, Ingo made some point about using --show- for some reason,
Ingo?
One I can think of is that, in general, plain --feature can mean, at
least, one of --enable-feature and --show-feature, so perhaps that is
the point.
But then,
From: Namhyung Kim
The --show-time-info option is for displaying elapsed sampling time
information for each entry.
$ perf record -- perf bench sched messaging
$ perf report --stdio --show-time-info
...
# Samples: 10K of event 'cycles'
# Event count (approx.): 5118793536
# Total
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
The --show-time-info option is for displaying elapsed sampling time
information for each entry.
$ perf record -- perf bench sched messaging
$ perf report --stdio --show-time-info
...
# Samples: 10K of event 'cycles'
# Event count (approx.):
22 matches
Mail list logo