On 11/07/2016 18:53, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel
>
> Paolo pointed out that irqs are already blocked when irqtime_account_irq
> is called. That means there is no reason to call local_irq_save/restore
> again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
>
On 11/07/2016 18:53, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel
>
> Paolo pointed out that irqs are already blocked when irqtime_account_irq
> is called. That means there is no reason to call local_irq_save/restore
> again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini
>
From: Rik van Riel
Paolo pointed out that irqs are already blocked when irqtime_account_irq
is called. That means there is no reason to call local_irq_save/restore
again.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
From: Rik van Riel
Paolo pointed out that irqs are already blocked when irqtime_account_irq
is called. That means there is no reason to call local_irq_save/restore
again.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 4
1 file changed, 4
4 matches
Mail list logo