Re: [PATCH 3/3] time: drop local_irq_save/restore from irqtime_account_irq

2016-07-11 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 11/07/2016 18:53, r...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Rik van Riel > > Paolo pointed out that irqs are already blocked when irqtime_account_irq > is called. That means there is no reason to call local_irq_save/restore > again. > > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] time: drop local_irq_save/restore from irqtime_account_irq

2016-07-11 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 11/07/2016 18:53, r...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Rik van Riel > > Paolo pointed out that irqs are already blocked when irqtime_account_irq > is called. That means there is no reason to call local_irq_save/restore > again. > > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel > Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini >

[PATCH 3/3] time: drop local_irq_save/restore from irqtime_account_irq

2016-07-11 Thread riel
From: Rik van Riel Paolo pointed out that irqs are already blocked when irqtime_account_irq is called. That means there is no reason to call local_irq_save/restore again. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini ---

[PATCH 3/3] time: drop local_irq_save/restore from irqtime_account_irq

2016-07-11 Thread riel
From: Rik van Riel Paolo pointed out that irqs are already blocked when irqtime_account_irq is called. That means there is no reason to call local_irq_save/restore again. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini --- kernel/sched/cputime.c | 4 1 file changed, 4