On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:38:19 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:14:56 -0400
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > > cpu_set(ret_mask, i) sets bits from begin to end in uint64_t cpumask
> > > from below.
> > >
> > > What happens
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:38:19 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:14:56 -0400
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > > cpu_set(ret_mask, i) sets bits from begin to end in uint64_t cpumask
> > > from below.
> > >
> > > What happens if this range is greater than 64? We already
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:14:56 -0400
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >
> > cpu_set(ret_mask, i) sets bits from begin to end in uint64_t cpumask
> > from below.
> >
> > What happens if this range is greater than 64? We already have boxes
> > that run this with 80 CPUs. Looks to
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:14:56 -0400
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >
> > cpu_set(ret_mask, i) sets bits from begin to end in uint64_t cpumask
> > from below.
> >
> > What happens if this range is greater than 64? We already have boxes
> > that run this with 80 CPUs. Looks to be out of memory range
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:15:57 -0400
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:50:10 -0400
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:49:22 -0400
> > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry it took so long to look
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:15:57 -0400
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:50:10 -0400
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:49:22 -0400
> > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry it took so long to look at this, but I finally got around to
> > > it ;-)
> > >
> >
>
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:50:10 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:49:22 -0400
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > Sorry it took so long to look at this, but I finally got around to
> > it ;-)
> >
>
> I did apply patches 1 and 2. I'm
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:50:10 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:49:22 -0400
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > Sorry it took so long to look at this, but I finally got around to
> > it ;-)
> >
>
> I did apply patches 1 and 2. I'm hoping to get them out tomorrow, or
> while I'm
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:49:22 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Sorry it took so long to look at this, but I finally got around to
> it ;-)
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:47:11 -0400
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
> > With --cpu-list you can do:
> >
> > #
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:49:22 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Sorry it took so long to look at this, but I finally got around to
> it ;-)
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:47:11 -0400
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
> > With --cpu-list you can do:
> >
> > # trace-cmd record --cpu-list 1,4,10-15 [...]
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:49:22 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Sorry it took so long to look at this, but I finally got around to
> it ;-)
>
I did apply patches 1 and 2. I'm hoping to get them out tomorrow, or
while I'm at plumbers.
-- Steve
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:49:22 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Sorry it took so long to look at this, but I finally got around to
> it ;-)
>
I did apply patches 1 and 2. I'm hoping to get them out tomorrow, or
while I'm at plumbers.
-- Steve
Sorry it took so long to look at this, but I finally got around to
it ;-)
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:47:11 -0400
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> With --cpu-list you can do:
>
> # trace-cmd record --cpu-list 1,4,10-15 [...]
>
> Which is much more human friendly than -M.
>
>
Sorry it took so long to look at this, but I finally got around to
it ;-)
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:47:11 -0400
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> With --cpu-list you can do:
>
> # trace-cmd record --cpu-list 1,4,10-15 [...]
>
> Which is much more human friendly than -M.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luiz
With --cpu-list you can do:
# trace-cmd record --cpu-list 1,4,10-15 [...]
Which is much more human friendly than -M.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino
---
Documentation/trace-cmd-record.1.txt | 4 +
trace-record.c | 138
With --cpu-list you can do:
# trace-cmd record --cpu-list 1,4,10-15 [...]
Which is much more human friendly than -M.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino
---
Documentation/trace-cmd-record.1.txt | 4 +
trace-record.c | 138 +++
2 files
16 matches
Mail list logo