On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:22:25PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > Anyway, could you review my previous patchset, that is, 'overload struct
> > slab
> > over struct page to reduce memory usage'? I'm not sure whether your answer
> > is
> > ack or
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:22:25PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
Anyway, could you review my previous patchset, that is, 'overload struct
slab
over struct page to reduce memory usage'? I'm not sure whether your answer
is
ack or not.
I
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Anyway, could you review my previous patchset, that is, 'overload struct slab
> over struct page to reduce memory usage'? I'm not sure whether your answer is
> ack or not.
I scanned over it before but I was not able to see if it was correct on
first
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
Anyway, could you review my previous patchset, that is, 'overload struct slab
over struct page to reduce memory usage'? I'm not sure whether your answer is
ack or not.
I scanned over it before but I was not able to see if it was correct on
first glance.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:25:05PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:44:03PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > >
> > > > 32 byte is not minimum object size, minimum *kmalloc*
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:44:03PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >
> > > 32 byte is not minimum object size, minimum *kmalloc* object size
> > > in default configuration. There are some slabs that their
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:44:03PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
32 byte is not minimum object size, minimum *kmalloc* object size
in default configuration. There are some slabs that their object size is
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:25:05PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:44:03PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
32 byte is not minimum object size, minimum *kmalloc* object size
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:44:03PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > 32 byte is not minimum object size, minimum *kmalloc* object size
> > in default configuration. There are some slabs that their object size is
> > less than 32 byte. If we have a 8
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 32 byte is not minimum object size, minimum *kmalloc* object size
> in default configuration. There are some slabs that their object size is
> less than 32 byte. If we have a 8 byte sized kmem_cache, it has 512 objects
> in 4K page.
As far as I can recall
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
32 byte is not minimum object size, minimum *kmalloc* object size
in default configuration. There are some slabs that their object size is
less than 32 byte. If we have a 8 byte sized kmem_cache, it has 512 objects
in 4K page.
As far as I can recall
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:44:03PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
32 byte is not minimum object size, minimum *kmalloc* object size
in default configuration. There are some slabs that their object size is
less than 32 byte. If we have a 8 byte sized
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 03:58:18PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > Currently, the freelist of a slab consist of unsigned int sized indexes.
> > Most of slabs have less number of objects than 256, since restriction
> > for page order is at most 1 in
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 03:58:18PM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
Currently, the freelist of a slab consist of unsigned int sized indexes.
Most of slabs have less number of objects than 256, since restriction
for page order is at most 1 in default
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Currently, the freelist of a slab consist of unsigned int sized indexes.
> Most of slabs have less number of objects than 256, since restriction
> for page order is at most 1 in default configuration. For example,
> consider a slab consisting of 32 byte
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
Currently, the freelist of a slab consist of unsigned int sized indexes.
Most of slabs have less number of objects than 256, since restriction
for page order is at most 1 in default configuration. For example,
consider a slab consisting of 32 byte sized
Currently, the freelist of a slab consist of unsigned int sized indexes.
Most of slabs have less number of objects than 256, since restriction
for page order is at most 1 in default configuration. For example,
consider a slab consisting of 32 byte sized objects on two continous
pages. In this
Currently, the freelist of a slab consist of unsigned int sized indexes.
Most of slabs have less number of objects than 256, since restriction
for page order is at most 1 in default configuration. For example,
consider a slab consisting of 32 byte sized objects on two continous
pages. In this
Currently, the freelist of a slab consist of unsigned int sized indexes.
Most of slabs have less number of objects than 256, since restriction
for page order is at most 1 in default configuration. For example,
consider a slab consisting of 32 byte sized objects on two continous
pages. In this
Currently, the freelist of a slab consist of unsigned int sized indexes.
Most of slabs have less number of objects than 256, since restriction
for page order is at most 1 in default configuration. For example,
consider a slab consisting of 32 byte sized objects on two continous
pages. In this
20 matches
Mail list logo
