> Hmm, are you sure you need to convert
> "err" to the pointer, just to return true/false
> as the return value?
> How about still returning "err" itself?
In this case i need to reserve some value for
"err" as success, because both 0 and negative
values are passed to caller when this function
Hi Arseny!
03.01.2021 23:03, Arseny Krasnov пишет:
From: Arseniy Krasnov
For send, this patch adds:
1) Send of record begin marker with record length.
2) Return error if send of whole record is failed.
For receive, this patch adds another loop, it looks like
stream loop, but:
From: Arseniy Krasnov
For send, this patch adds:
1) Send of record begin marker with record length.
2) Return error if send of whole record is failed.
For receive, this patch adds another loop, it looks like
stream loop, but:
1) It doesn't call notify callbacks.
2) It doesn't care
3 matches
Mail list logo
