Re: [PATCH 3/5] wl1251: call pm_runtime_put_sync in pm_runtime_get_sync failed case

2013-03-05 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 15:51 +0800, Li Fei wrote: > Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count > is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct > value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call > pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case. > > Signed-off-by Liu

Re: [PATCH 3/5] wl1251: call pm_runtime_put_sync in pm_runtime_get_sync failed case

2013-02-28 Thread Luciano Coelho
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 15:51 +0800, Li Fei wrote: > Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count > is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct > value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call > pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case. > > Signed-off-by Liu

[PATCH 3/5] wl1251: call pm_runtime_put_sync in pm_runtime_get_sync failed case

2013-02-27 Thread Li Fei
Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case. Signed-off-by Liu Chuansheng Signed-off-by: Li Fei --- drivers/net/wireless