On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:53:17PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> What's the advantage of using iov_iter_bvec over iov_iter_kvec ?
No need to screw with kmap() in the caller; moreover, when it comes to actual
copying it gets away with kmap_atomic() just around the memcpy(), which is
considerably
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:53:17PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> What's the advantage of using iov_iter_bvec over iov_iter_kvec ?
No need to screw with kmap() in the caller; moreover, when it comes to actual
copying it gets away with kmap_atomic() just around the memcpy(), which is
considerably
On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 21:51 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> ... and use ITER_BVEC for the page part of request to send
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro
> ---
> fs/cifs/cifsproto.h | 2 -
> fs/cifs/transport.c | 141 +++---
> --
> 2 files
On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 21:51 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> ... and use ITER_BVEC for the page part of request to send
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro
> ---
> fs/cifs/cifsproto.h | 2 -
> fs/cifs/transport.c | 141 +++---
> --
> 2 files changed, 41
... and use ITER_BVEC for the page part of request to send
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
---
fs/cifs/cifsproto.h | 2 -
fs/cifs/transport.c | 141 +++-
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
diff --git
... and use ITER_BVEC for the page part of request to send
Signed-off-by: Al Viro
---
fs/cifs/cifsproto.h | 2 -
fs/cifs/transport.c | 141 +++-
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
6 matches
Mail list logo