On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:06:08AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> The subsequent patches will use struct dev_pm_qos_request for
> representing both latency requests and flags requests. To make that
> easier, put the node member of struct dev_pm_qos_request (under
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:06:08AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
The subsequent patches will use struct dev_pm_qos_request for
representing both latency requests and flags requests. To make that
easier, put the node member of struct
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
The subsequent patches will use struct dev_pm_qos_request for
representing both latency requests and flags requests. To make that
easier, put the node member of struct dev_pm_qos_request (under the
name "pnode") into a union called "data" that will represent the
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
The subsequent patches will use struct dev_pm_qos_request for
representing both latency requests and flags requests. To make that
easier, put the node member of struct dev_pm_qos_request (under the
name pnode) into a union called data that will
4 matches
Mail list logo