Re: [PATCH 3/7] dma: iop-adma: use correct printk format strings

2019-08-12 Thread Vinod Koul
On 09-08-19, 18:33, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> When compile-testing on other architectures, we get lots of warnings
> about incorrect format strings, like:
> 
>drivers/dma/iop-adma.c: In function 'iop_adma_alloc_slots':
>drivers/dma/iop-adma.c:307:6: warning: format '%x' expects argument of 
> type 'unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka long long 
> unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
> 
>drivers/dma/iop-adma.c: In function 'iop_adma_prep_dma_memcpy':
> >> drivers/dma/iop-adma.c:518:40: warning: format '%u' expects argument of 
> >> type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'size_t {aka long unsigned 
> >> int}' [-Wformat=]
> 
> Use %zu for printing size_t as required, and cast the dma_addr_t
> arguments to 'u64' for printing with %llx. Ideally this should use
> the %pad format string, but that requires an lvalue argument that
> doesn't work here.

Please change title to "dmaengine: iop-adma: use correct printk format strings"

After that:

Acked-by: Vinod Koul 

> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 
> ---
>  drivers/dma/iop-adma.c | 18 +-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c b/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c
> index 7857b54770d1..aebdd671651a 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c
> @@ -117,9 +117,9 @@ static void __iop_adma_slot_cleanup(struct iop_adma_chan 
> *iop_chan)
>   list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, _iter, _chan->chain,
>   chain_node) {
>   pr_debug("\tcookie: %d slot: %d busy: %d "
> - "this_desc: %#x next_desc: %#x ack: %d\n",
> + "this_desc: %#x next_desc: %#llx ack: %d\n",
>   iter->async_tx.cookie, iter->idx, busy,
> - iter->async_tx.phys, iop_desc_get_next_desc(iter),
> + iter->async_tx.phys, (u64)iop_desc_get_next_desc(iter),
>   async_tx_test_ack(>async_tx));
>   prefetch(_iter);
>   prefetch(&_iter->async_tx);
> @@ -307,9 +307,9 @@ iop_adma_alloc_slots(struct iop_adma_chan *iop_chan, int 
> num_slots,
>   int i;
>   dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev,
>   "allocated slot: %d "
> - "(desc %p phys: %#x) slots_per_op %d\n",
> + "(desc %p phys: %#llx) slots_per_op 
> %d\n",
>   iter->idx, iter->hw_desc,
> - iter->async_tx.phys, slots_per_op);
> + (u64)iter->async_tx.phys, slots_per_op);
>  
>   /* pre-ack all but the last descriptor */
>   if (num_slots != slots_per_op)
> @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, 
> dma_addr_t dma_dest,
>   return NULL;
>   BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
>  
> - dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s len: %u\n",
> + dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s len: %zu\n",
>   __func__, len);
>  
>   spin_lock_bh(_chan->lock);
> @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_xor(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t 
> dma_dest,
>   BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
>  
>   dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev,
> - "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u flags: %lx\n",
> + "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu flags: %lx\n",
>   __func__, src_cnt, len, flags);
>  
>   spin_lock_bh(_chan->lock);
> @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_xor_val(struct dma_chan *chan, 
> dma_addr_t *dma_src,
>   if (unlikely(!len))
>   return NULL;
>  
> - dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u\n",
> + dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu\n",
>   __func__, src_cnt, len);
>  
>   spin_lock_bh(_chan->lock);
> @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_pq(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t 
> *dst, dma_addr_t *src,
>   BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
>  
>   dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev,
> - "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u flags: %lx\n",
> + "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu flags: %lx\n",
>   __func__, src_cnt, len, flags);
>  
>   if (dmaf_p_disabled_continue(flags))
> @@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_pq_val(struct dma_chan *chan, 
> dma_addr_t *pq, dma_addr_t *src,
>   return NULL;
>   BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
>  
> - dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u\n",
> + dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu\n",
>   __func__, src_cnt, len);
>  
>   spin_lock_bh(_chan->lock);
> -- 
> 2.20.0

-- 
~Vinod


[PATCH 3/7] dma: iop-adma: use correct printk format strings

2019-08-09 Thread Arnd Bergmann
When compile-testing on other architectures, we get lots of warnings
about incorrect format strings, like:

   drivers/dma/iop-adma.c: In function 'iop_adma_alloc_slots':
   drivers/dma/iop-adma.c:307:6: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 
'unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'dma_addr_t {aka long long unsigned 
int}' [-Wformat=]

   drivers/dma/iop-adma.c: In function 'iop_adma_prep_dma_memcpy':
>> drivers/dma/iop-adma.c:518:40: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 
>> 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'size_t {aka long unsigned int}' 
>> [-Wformat=]

Use %zu for printing size_t as required, and cast the dma_addr_t
arguments to 'u64' for printing with %llx. Ideally this should use
the %pad format string, but that requires an lvalue argument that
doesn't work here.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann 
---
 drivers/dma/iop-adma.c | 18 +-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c b/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c
index 7857b54770d1..aebdd671651a 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c
@@ -117,9 +117,9 @@ static void __iop_adma_slot_cleanup(struct iop_adma_chan 
*iop_chan)
list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, _iter, _chan->chain,
chain_node) {
pr_debug("\tcookie: %d slot: %d busy: %d "
-   "this_desc: %#x next_desc: %#x ack: %d\n",
+   "this_desc: %#x next_desc: %#llx ack: %d\n",
iter->async_tx.cookie, iter->idx, busy,
-   iter->async_tx.phys, iop_desc_get_next_desc(iter),
+   iter->async_tx.phys, (u64)iop_desc_get_next_desc(iter),
async_tx_test_ack(>async_tx));
prefetch(_iter);
prefetch(&_iter->async_tx);
@@ -307,9 +307,9 @@ iop_adma_alloc_slots(struct iop_adma_chan *iop_chan, int 
num_slots,
int i;
dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev,
"allocated slot: %d "
-   "(desc %p phys: %#x) slots_per_op %d\n",
+   "(desc %p phys: %#llx) slots_per_op 
%d\n",
iter->idx, iter->hw_desc,
-   iter->async_tx.phys, slots_per_op);
+   (u64)iter->async_tx.phys, slots_per_op);
 
/* pre-ack all but the last descriptor */
if (num_slots != slots_per_op)
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t 
dma_dest,
return NULL;
BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
 
-   dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s len: %u\n",
+   dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s len: %zu\n",
__func__, len);
 
spin_lock_bh(_chan->lock);
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_xor(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t 
dma_dest,
BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
 
dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev,
-   "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u flags: %lx\n",
+   "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu flags: %lx\n",
__func__, src_cnt, len, flags);
 
spin_lock_bh(_chan->lock);
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_xor_val(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t 
*dma_src,
if (unlikely(!len))
return NULL;
 
-   dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u\n",
+   dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu\n",
__func__, src_cnt, len);
 
spin_lock_bh(_chan->lock);
@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_pq(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t 
*dst, dma_addr_t *src,
BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
 
dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev,
-   "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u flags: %lx\n",
+   "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu flags: %lx\n",
__func__, src_cnt, len, flags);
 
if (dmaf_p_disabled_continue(flags))
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ iop_adma_prep_dma_pq_val(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t 
*pq, dma_addr_t *src,
return NULL;
BUG_ON(len > IOP_ADMA_XOR_MAX_BYTE_COUNT);
 
-   dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %u\n",
+   dev_dbg(iop_chan->device->common.dev, "%s src_cnt: %d len: %zu\n",
__func__, src_cnt, len);
 
spin_lock_bh(_chan->lock);
-- 
2.20.0