On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:12:34PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:02:51AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 07:59 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Hi James,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:38:48PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:12:34PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:02:51AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 07:59 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Hi James,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:38:48PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:02:51AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 07:59 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:38:48PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 23:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > (...)
> > > > We
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:02:51AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 07:59 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:38:48PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 23:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > (...)
> > > > We
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 07:59 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:38:48PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 23:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> (...)
> > > We don't have the referenced commit above in 3.10 so we should be
> > > safe.
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 07:59 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:38:48PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 23:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> (...)
> > > We don't have the referenced commit above in 3.10 so we should be
> > > safe.
Hi James,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:38:48PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 23:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
(...)
> > We don't have the referenced commit above in 3.10 so we should be
> > safe. Additionally I checked that neither 4.4 nor 3.12 have them
> > either, so
Hi James,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:38:48PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 23:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
(...)
> > We don't have the referenced commit above in 3.10 so we should be
> > safe. Additionally I checked that neither 4.4 nor 3.12 have them
> > either, so
On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 23:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Sathya,
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:21:44AM -0700, Sathya Prakash Veerichetty
> wrote:
> > Willy,
> > I think this patch had a problem and later modified to a different
> > blocking mechanism. Could you please pull in the latest
On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 23:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Sathya,
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:21:44AM -0700, Sathya Prakash Veerichetty
> wrote:
> > Willy,
> > I think this patch had a problem and later modified to a different
> > blocking mechanism. Could you please pull in the latest
Hi Sathya,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:21:44AM -0700, Sathya Prakash Veerichetty wrote:
> Willy,
> I think this patch had a problem and later modified to a different
> blocking mechanism. Could you please pull in the latest change for this?
Much appreciated, thanks. I've checked and found the
Hi Sathya,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:21:44AM -0700, Sathya Prakash Veerichetty wrote:
> Willy,
> I think this patch had a problem and later modified to a different
> blocking mechanism. Could you please pull in the latest change for this?
Much appreciated, thanks. I've checked and found the
@vger.kernel.org; sta...@vger.kernel.org;
li...@roeck-us.net
Cc: Andrey Grodzovsky; linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; Sathya Prakash; Chaitra
P B; Suganath Prabu Subramani; Sreekanth Reddy; Hannes Reinecke; Martin K
. Petersen; Willy Tarreau
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 141/319] scsi: mpt3sas: Fix secure erase premature
@vger.kernel.org; sta...@vger.kernel.org;
li...@roeck-us.net
Cc: Andrey Grodzovsky; linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; Sathya Prakash; Chaitra
P B; Suganath Prabu Subramani; Sreekanth Reddy; Hannes Reinecke; Martin K
. Petersen; Willy Tarreau
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 141/319] scsi: mpt3sas: Fix secure erase premature
From: Andrey Grodzovsky
commit 18f6084a989ba1b38702f9af37a2e4049a924be6 upstream.
This is a work around for a bug with LSI Fusion MPT SAS2 when perfoming
secure erase. Due to the very long time the operation takes, commands
issued during the erase will time out and will
From: Andrey Grodzovsky
commit 18f6084a989ba1b38702f9af37a2e4049a924be6 upstream.
This is a work around for a bug with LSI Fusion MPT SAS2 when perfoming
secure erase. Due to the very long time the operation takes, commands
issued during the erase will time out and will trigger execution of the
16 matches
Mail list logo