Re: [PATCH 3.14] power_supply: don't export power_supply_notifier

2014-02-25 Thread Jenny Tc
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:19:28PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > From: Johannes Berg > > Since there are registration/unregistration functions and the > invocation is in the core code, there's no need to export the > notifier chain head, make it static instead. This is a generic notifier which

Re: [PATCH 3.14] power_supply: don't export power_supply_notifier

2014-02-25 Thread Jenny Tc
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:19:28PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: From: Johannes Berg johannes.b...@intel.com Since there are registration/unregistration functions and the invocation is in the core code, there's no need to export the notifier chain head, make it static instead. This is a

[PATCH 3.14] power_supply: don't export power_supply_notifier

2014-02-21 Thread Johannes Berg
From: Johannes Berg Since there are registration/unregistration functions and the invocation is in the core code, there's no need to export the notifier chain head, make it static instead. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg --- This should probably go into 3.14 so it's not exported in the release.

[PATCH 3.14] power_supply: don't export power_supply_notifier

2014-02-21 Thread Johannes Berg
From: Johannes Berg johannes.b...@intel.com Since there are registration/unregistration functions and the invocation is in the core code, there's no need to export the notifier chain head, make it static instead. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg johannes.b...@intel.com --- This should probably go