On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 19:19 +0900, Akira Takeuchi wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:26:43 +
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 03:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > 3.2.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > know.
> > >
> > >
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 19:19 +0900, Akira Takeuchi wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:26:43 +
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 03:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
3.2.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:25:30AM +0900, Akira Takeuchi wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:32:07 +
> Luis Henriques wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 07:19:10PM +0900, Akira Takeuchi wrote:
> > > On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:26:43 +
> > > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 2013-12-29
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:25:30AM +0900, Akira Takeuchi wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:32:07 +
Luis Henriques luis.henriq...@canonical.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 07:19:10PM +0900, Akira Takeuchi wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:26:43 +
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:32:07 +
Luis Henriques wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 07:19:10PM +0900, Akira Takeuchi wrote:
> > On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:26:43 +
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 03:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > 3.2.54-rc1 review patch. If
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 07:19:10PM +0900, Akira Takeuchi wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:26:43 +
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 03:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > 3.2.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > know.
> > >
> > >
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:26:43 +
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 03:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 3.2.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: Akira Takeuchi
> >
> > commit
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:26:43 +
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 03:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
3.2.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Akira Takeuchi takeuchi@jp.panasonic.com
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 07:19:10PM +0900, Akira Takeuchi wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:26:43 +
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 03:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
3.2.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:32:07 +
Luis Henriques luis.henriq...@canonical.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 07:19:10PM +0900, Akira Takeuchi wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 04:26:43 +
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 03:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 03:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Akira Takeuchi
>
> commit 2afc745f3e3079ab16c826be4860da2529054dd2 upstream.
[...]
> [bwh: Backported to 3.2:
> As we do not
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 03:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
3.2.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Akira Takeuchi takeuchi@jp.panasonic.com
commit 2afc745f3e3079ab16c826be4860da2529054dd2 upstream.
[...]
[bwh: Backported to
3.2.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Akira Takeuchi
commit 2afc745f3e3079ab16c826be4860da2529054dd2 upstream.
This patch fixes the problem that get_unmapped_area() can return illegal
address and result in failing mmap(2) etc.
In
3.2.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Akira Takeuchi takeuchi@jp.panasonic.com
commit 2afc745f3e3079ab16c826be4860da2529054dd2 upstream.
This patch fixes the problem that get_unmapped_area() can return illegal
address and
14 matches
Mail list logo