On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:07:15PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> These changes not so much burden for me personally (it was actually easier
> for me to just apply the patch without all the arguing), but for those who
> actually do real bugfixes/features in the drivers: their local development
>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:07:15PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
These changes not so much burden for me personally (it was actually easier
for me to just apply the patch without all the arguing), but for those who
actually do real bugfixes/features in the drivers: their local development
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 07:07:14PM -0700, 'Greg Kroah-Hartman' wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:18:49PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:36:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
> > > choice.
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:07 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:18:49PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:36:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
> > > choice. That's the
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 10:19 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:36:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
> > choice. That's the end of the story.
>
> Just to clarify: I don't want to take the patch for
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:18:49PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:36:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
> > choice. That's the end of the story.
>
> Just to clarify: I don't want to take the patch
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:36:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
> choice. That's the end of the story.
Just to clarify: I don't want to take the patch for a reason, not just
because of my mood today. Once the patch comes in
On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 5:37 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
> choice. That's the end of the story.
>
I know that the maintainer's choice is important,
because I am also a maintainer of other system or drivers.
But, there
He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
choice. That's the end of the story.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
choice. That's the end of the story.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 5:37 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
choice. That's the end of the story.
I know that the maintainer's choice is important,
because I am also a maintainer of other system or drivers.
But, there is
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:36:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
choice. That's the end of the story.
Just to clarify: I don't want to take the patch for a reason, not just
because of my mood today. Once the patch comes in
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:18:49PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:36:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
choice. That's the end of the story.
Just to clarify: I don't want to take the patch for a
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 10:19 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:36:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
choice. That's the end of the story.
Just to clarify: I don't want to take the patch for a
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:07 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:18:49PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:36:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
choice. That's the end of
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 07:07:14PM -0700, 'Greg Kroah-Hartman' wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 06:18:49PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:36:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
He doesn't want to take the patch. He's the maintainer so it's his
choice. That's the end
On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:59 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:00:39PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > > Use the wrapper function for retrieving the platform data instead of
> > > > > accessing dev->platform_data directly.
> > > >
> > > > Um.. what is the benefit
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:00:39PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > Use the wrapper function for retrieving the platform data instead of
> > > > accessing dev->platform_data directly.
> > >
> > > Um.. what is the benefit or rationale of this patch?
> >
> > CC'ed Joe Perches, Dan Carpenter
> >
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:00:39PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Use the wrapper function for retrieving the platform data instead of
accessing dev-platform_data directly.
Um.. what is the benefit or rationale of this patch?
CC'ed Joe Perches, Dan Carpenter
Hi Anton
On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:59 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:00:39PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Use the wrapper function for retrieving the platform data instead of
accessing dev-platform_data directly.
Um.. what is the benefit or rationale of this
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:22:42AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Saturday, August 10, 2013 7:05 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 05:19:27PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > Use the wrapper function for retrieving the platform data instead of
> > > accessing dev->platform_data
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 09:22:42AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 7:05 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 05:19:27PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
Use the wrapper function for retrieving the platform data instead of
accessing dev-platform_data directly.
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 7:05 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 05:19:27PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > Use the wrapper function for retrieving the platform data instead of
> > accessing dev->platform_data directly.
>
> Um.. what is the benefit or rationale of this patch?
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 7:05 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 05:19:27PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
Use the wrapper function for retrieving the platform data instead of
accessing dev-platform_data directly.
Um.. what is the benefit or rationale of this patch?
CC'ed
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 05:19:27PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> Use the wrapper function for retrieving the platform data instead of
> accessing dev->platform_data directly.
Um.. what is the benefit or rationale of this patch?
Thanks,
Anton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 05:19:27PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
Use the wrapper function for retrieving the platform data instead of
accessing dev-platform_data directly.
Um.. what is the benefit or rationale of this patch?
Thanks,
Anton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Use the wrapper function for retrieving the platform data instead of
accessing dev->platform_data directly.
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han
---
drivers/power/88pm860x_battery.c|2 +-
drivers/power/ab8500_btemp.c|2 +-
drivers/power/ab8500_charger.c |2 +-
Use the wrapper function for retrieving the platform data instead of
accessing dev-platform_data directly.
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com
---
drivers/power/88pm860x_battery.c|2 +-
drivers/power/ab8500_btemp.c|2 +-
drivers/power/ab8500_charger.c |2 +-
28 matches
Mail list logo
