Re: [PATCH 33 of 33] IB/ipath - fix drift between WCs in user and kernel space

For example this seems like it should go in 2.6.21 -- otherwise userspace verbs are completely broken with ipath, right? It's really my fault for breaking it, but I don't see why we want to release with a bug like that. - R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH 33 of 33] IB/ipath - fix drift between WCs in user and kernel space

For example this seems like it should go in 2.6.21 -- otherwise userspace verbs are completely broken with ipath, right? It's really my fault for breaking it, but I don't see why we want to release with a bug like that. - R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

[PATCH 33 of 33] IB/ipath - fix drift between WCs in user and kernel space

# HG changeset patch # User Robert Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Date 1173994466 25200 # Node ID e61b0123190cfbc01cc34d1c648d1752a89f8f3d # Parent c3b5b279bc90e5758da2ac382cbff4ee0245e84b IB/ipath - fix drift between WCs in user and kernel space The kernel ib_wc structure now uses a QP pointer,

[PATCH 33 of 33] IB/ipath - fix drift between WCs in user and kernel space

# HG changeset patch # User Robert Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Date 1173994466 25200 # Node ID e61b0123190cfbc01cc34d1c648d1752a89f8f3d # Parent c3b5b279bc90e5758da2ac382cbff4ee0245e84b IB/ipath - fix drift between WCs in user and kernel space The kernel ib_wc structure now uses a QP pointer, but