On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 07:32 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > But even that looks like it should be considered a bug. Please file in
> > GNOME bugzilla.
>
> In my case it doesn't have an inline part. I only get an attachment,
>
> I'll file it in gnome bz.
Hah, story of my life: 3.8.x
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 18:12 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 16:45 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > David; in particular; quilt mail adds "Content-Disposition: inline"
> > headers and Evo, in its infinite wisdom, makes the entire body into an
> > attachment.
>
> Hm,
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 16:45 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> David; in particular; quilt mail adds "Content-Disposition: inline"
> headers and Evo, in its infinite wisdom, makes the entire body into an
> attachment.
Hm, looking at the original email I see it as an inline part, displayed
by
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 09:01:19PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 10:42 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:50:08PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
> > > in the
Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 10:42 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:50:08PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> > For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
>> > in the email, which makes reviewing a major PITA.
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 21:00 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 08:54 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
> > > > in the email, which makes reviewing a major PITA. Christoph, I'm not
> > > > sure
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 08:54 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
> > > in the email, which makes reviewing a major PITA. Christoph, I'm not
> > > sure what you are doing wrong here but you should consider fixing it :-)
> >
> >
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 10:42 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:50:08PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
> > in the email, which makes reviewing a major PITA. Christoph, I'm not
> > sure what you
-0600 (CST)
> Message-Id: <20140214201908.082769...@linux.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:19:20 -0600
> From: Christoph Lameter
> To: Tejun Heo
> Cc: a...@linuxfoundation.org,
> rost...@goodmis.org,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> Ingo Molnar ,
> Peter
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:50:08PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
> in the email, which makes reviewing a major PITA. Christoph, I'm not
> sure what you are doing wrong here but you should consider fixing it :-)
Yeah,
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:50:08PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
in the email, which makes reviewing a major PITA. Christoph, I'm not
sure what you are doing wrong here but you should consider fixing it :-)
Yeah,
...@kernel.crashing.org,
Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
Subject: [PATCH 39/48] powerpc: Replace __get_cpu_var uses
References: 20140214201841.826179...@linux.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline; filename=this_powerpc
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 10:42 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:50:08PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
in the email, which makes reviewing a major PITA. Christoph, I'm not
sure what you are
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 08:54 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
in the email, which makes reviewing a major PITA. Christoph, I'm not
sure what you are doing wrong here but you should consider fixing it :-)
Get a better
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 21:00 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 08:54 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
in the email, which makes reviewing a major PITA. Christoph, I'm not
sure what you are
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org writes:
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 10:42 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:50:08PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
in the email, which makes
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 09:01:19PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 10:42 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:50:08PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
in the email,
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 16:45 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
David; in particular; quilt mail adds Content-Disposition: inline
headers and Evo, in its infinite wisdom, makes the entire body into an
attachment.
Hm, looking at the original email I see it as an inline part, displayed
by default. I
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 18:12 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sat, 2014-02-15 at 16:45 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
David; in particular; quilt mail adds Content-Disposition: inline
headers and Evo, in its infinite wisdom, makes the entire body into an
attachment.
Hm, looking at the
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 07:32 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
But even that looks like it should be considered a bug. Please file in
GNOME bugzilla.
In my case it doesn't have an inline part. I only get an attachment,
I'll file it in gnome bz.
Hah, story of my life: 3.8.x is marked
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 23:26 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 14:50:08 +1100
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
> > in the email, which makes reviewing a major PITA. Christoph, I'm not
> > sure what you
ri, 14 Feb 2014 14:19:20 -0600
From: Christoph Lameter
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: a...@linuxfoundation.org,
rost...@goodmis.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar ,
Peter Zijlstra ,
Thomas Gleixner ,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt ,
Paul Mackerras
Subject: [PATCH 39/48] powerpc: Replace __g
For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
in the email, which makes reviewing a major PITA. Christoph, I'm not
sure what you are doing wrong here but you should consider fixing it :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
__get_cpu_var() is used for multiple purposes in the kernel source. One of
them is address calculation via the form &__get_cpu_var(x). This calculates
the address for the instance of the percpu variable of the current processor
based on an offset.
Other use cases are for storing and retrieving
__get_cpu_var() is used for multiple purposes in the kernel source. One of
them is address calculation via the form __get_cpu_var(x). This calculates
the address for the instance of the percpu variable of the current processor
based on an offset.
Other use cases are for storing and retrieving
For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
in the email, which makes reviewing a major PITA. Christoph, I'm not
sure what you are doing wrong here but you should consider fixing it :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Gleixner t...@linutronix.de,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org,
Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
Subject: [PATCH 39/48] powerpc: Replace __get_cpu_var uses
References: 20140214201841.826179...@linux.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline; filename
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 23:26 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 14:50:08 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
For some reason Im still getting these as attachments instead of inline
in the email, which makes reviewing a major PITA. Christoph, I'm not
28 matches
Mail list logo
