On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:23:58PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >> Hence removing support for the parts which are broken rather than
> >> pretending to support it and giving incorrect data.
> >
> > Uh what, how about attempt to fix it?
>
> No hope to do that by 4.6 release ... so I suggested to Vika
>> Hence removing support for the parts which are broken rather than
>> pretending to support it and giving incorrect data.
>
> Uh what, how about attempt to fix it?
No hope to do that by 4.6 release ... so I suggested to Vikas that it would be
better to disable
the feature now so users wouldn't
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:27:21PM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> The cgroup support for cqm is broken. Instead of mapping RMID to a
> cgroup currently its mapped to the task and then hence when task moves
> cgroup we get incorrect count.
>
> Also the conflict handling code which is meant to handl
The cgroup support for cqm is broken. Instead of mapping RMID to a
cgroup currently its mapped to the task and then hence when task moves
cgroup we get incorrect count.
Also the conflict handling code which is meant to handle the case of
co-existing cgroup and task events, is broken. It reports ve
4 matches
Mail list logo
