Re: [PATCH 4/4] spi: mediatek: revise mtk_spi_probe() failure flow

2015-11-25 Thread lei liu
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 13:04 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:33:24AM +0800, lei liu wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 13:39 +, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:21:19AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: > > > > > This patch revises failure flow while

Re: [PATCH 4/4] spi: mediatek: revise mtk_spi_probe() failure flow

2015-11-25 Thread lei liu
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 13:04 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:33:24AM +0800, lei liu wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 13:39 +, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:21:19AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: > > > > > This patch revises failure flow while

Re: [PATCH 4/4] spi: mediatek: revise mtk_spi_probe() failure flow

2015-11-24 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:33:24AM +0800, lei liu wrote: > On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 13:39 +, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:21:19AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: > > > This patch revises failure flow while pm_runtime_enable(). > > Why? This also doesn't apply against current code,

Re: [PATCH 4/4] spi: mediatek: revise mtk_spi_probe() failure flow

2015-11-24 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:33:24AM +0800, lei liu wrote: > On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 13:39 +, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:21:19AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: > > > This patch revises failure flow while pm_runtime_enable(). > > Why? This also doesn't apply against current code,

Re: [PATCH 4/4] spi: mediatek: revise mtk_spi_probe() failure flow

2015-11-23 Thread lei liu
On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 13:39 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:21:19AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: > > This patch revises failure flow while pm_runtime_enable(). > > Why? This also doesn't apply against current code, please check and > resend. I don't know. I can git am this

Re: [PATCH 4/4] spi: mediatek: revise mtk_spi_probe() failure flow

2015-11-23 Thread lei liu
On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 13:39 +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:21:19AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: > > This patch revises failure flow while pm_runtime_enable(). > > Why? This also doesn't apply against current code, please check and > resend. I don't know. I can git am this

Re: [PATCH 4/4] spi: mediatek: revise mtk_spi_probe() failure flow

2015-11-21 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:21:19AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: > This patch revises failure flow while pm_runtime_enable(). Why? This also doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. > > Signed-off-by: Leilk Liu > --- > drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c | 15 --- > 1 file

Re: [PATCH 4/4] spi: mediatek: revise mtk_spi_probe() failure flow

2015-11-21 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:21:19AM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote: > This patch revises failure flow while pm_runtime_enable(). Why? This also doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. > > Signed-off-by: Leilk Liu > --- > drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c | 15

[PATCH 4/4] spi: mediatek: revise mtk_spi_probe() failure flow

2015-11-19 Thread Leilk Liu
This patch revises failure flow while pm_runtime_enable(). Signed-off-by: Leilk Liu --- drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c | 15 --- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c index 6c1a96e..00a36da 100644 ---

[PATCH 4/4] spi: mediatek: revise mtk_spi_probe() failure flow

2015-11-19 Thread Leilk Liu
This patch revises failure flow while pm_runtime_enable(). Signed-off-by: Leilk Liu --- drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c | 15 --- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mt65xx.c index