Thanks Joerg.
> -Original Message-
> From: Joerg Roedel [mailto:j...@8bytes.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 3:56 PM
> To: Stuart Yoder
> Cc: Sethi Varun-B16395; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] iom
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 05:31:51PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Okay. So if your architecture supports sizes over 2^32 then size_t
> > probably is already 64bits, right?
>
> No, on a 32-bit platform size_t would generally be 32-bits. But
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 05:31:51PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org wrote:
Okay. So if your architecture supports sizes over 2^32 then size_t
probably is already 64bits, right?
No, on a 32-bit platform size_t would generally be
Thanks Joerg.
-Original Message-
From: Joerg Roedel [mailto:j...@8bytes.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 3:56 PM
To: Stuart Yoder
Cc: Sethi Varun-B16395; io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] iommu: Add domain window
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 05:31:51PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:10:51PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >> > +static inline int
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 05:31:51PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:10:51PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org wrote:
+static inline int
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:10:51PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> > +static inline int iommu_domain_window_enable(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> > +
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:10:51PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > +static inline int iommu_domain_window_enable(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > +u32 wnd_nr, phys_addr_t paddr,
> > +
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Add the iommu_domain_window_enable() and iommu_domain_window_disable()
> functions to the IOMMU-API. These functions will be used to setup
> domains that are based on subwindows and not on paging.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel
> ---
>
Add the iommu_domain_window_enable() and iommu_domain_window_disable()
functions to the IOMMU-API. These functions will be used to setup
domains that are based on subwindows and not on paging.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel
---
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 20
Add the iommu_domain_window_enable() and iommu_domain_window_disable()
functions to the IOMMU-API. These functions will be used to setup
domains that are based on subwindows and not on paging.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org
---
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 20
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org wrote:
Add the iommu_domain_window_enable() and iommu_domain_window_disable()
functions to the IOMMU-API. These functions will be used to setup
domains that are based on subwindows and not on paging.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:10:51PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org wrote:
+static inline int iommu_domain_window_enable(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+u32 wnd_nr, phys_addr_t paddr,
+
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:10:51PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org wrote:
+static inline int iommu_domain_window_enable(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+
14 matches
Mail list logo
