Re: [PATCH 4/6] perf report: Use the offset address to find inline frames

2018-09-30 Thread Ravi Bangoria
Hi Milian, Seems this has a regression: With acme/perf/urgent: $ ./perf record -e cycles:u --call-graph=dwarf ls $ ./perf script ls 13585 602082.534478: 28032 cycles:u: 1f1f4 __GI___tunables_init+0xd3dc00a4 (/usr/lib64/ld-2.26.so)

Re: [PATCH 4/6] perf report: Use the offset address to find inline frames

2018-09-30 Thread Ravi Bangoria
Hi Milian, Seems this has a regression: With acme/perf/urgent: $ ./perf record -e cycles:u --call-graph=dwarf ls $ ./perf script ls 13585 602082.534478: 28032 cycles:u: 1f1f4 __GI___tunables_init+0xd3dc00a4 (/usr/lib64/ld-2.26.so)

[PATCH 4/6] perf report: Use the offset address to find inline frames

2018-09-28 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
From: Milian Wolff To correctly find inlined frames, we have to use the file offset instead of the virtual memory address. This was already fixed for displaying srcline information while displaying in commit 2a9d5050dc84fa20 ("perf script: Show correct offsets for DWARF-based unwinding"). We

[PATCH 4/6] perf report: Use the offset address to find inline frames

2018-09-28 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
From: Milian Wolff To correctly find inlined frames, we have to use the file offset instead of the virtual memory address. This was already fixed for displaying srcline information while displaying in commit 2a9d5050dc84fa20 ("perf script: Show correct offsets for DWARF-based unwinding"). We