Re: [PATCH 4/6] staging: sm750fb: correct incompatible pointer type

2015-03-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:58:42PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:11:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:46:55PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > we were

Re: [PATCH 4/6] staging: sm750fb: correct incompatible pointer type

2015-03-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:11:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:46:55PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > we were getting build warnings about assignment of incompatible > > > > That's a

Re: [PATCH 4/6] staging: sm750fb: correct incompatible pointer type

2015-03-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:58:42PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:11:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:46:55PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: we were getting build

Re: [PATCH 4/6] staging: sm750fb: correct incompatible pointer type

2015-03-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:11:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:46:55PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: we were getting build warnings about assignment of incompatible snip That's a nice

Re: [PATCH 4/6] staging: sm750fb: correct incompatible pointer type

2015-03-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:11:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:46:55PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > we were getting build warnings about assignment of incompatible > > pointer types. some of the function definitions were having wrong > > return type or

Re: [PATCH 4/6] staging: sm750fb: correct incompatible pointer type

2015-03-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:46:55PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > we were getting build warnings about assignment of incompatible > pointer types. some of the function definitions were having wrong > return type or arguments. > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee > --- >

[PATCH 4/6] staging: sm750fb: correct incompatible pointer type

2015-03-10 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
we were getting build warnings about assignment of incompatible pointer types. some of the function definitions were having wrong return type or arguments. Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee --- drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h | 11 ++- drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750_accel.c | 4 ++--

[PATCH 4/6] staging: sm750fb: correct incompatible pointer type

2015-03-10 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
we were getting build warnings about assignment of incompatible pointer types. some of the function definitions were having wrong return type or arguments. Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee su...@vectorindia.org --- drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h | 11 ++-

Re: [PATCH 4/6] staging: sm750fb: correct incompatible pointer type

2015-03-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:46:55PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: we were getting build warnings about assignment of incompatible pointer types. some of the function definitions were having wrong return type or arguments. Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee su...@vectorindia.org ---

Re: [PATCH 4/6] staging: sm750fb: correct incompatible pointer type

2015-03-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:11:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:46:55PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: we were getting build warnings about assignment of incompatible pointer types. some of the function definitions were having wrong return type or arguments.