On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:29:23AM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> On 09/28/2016 05:45 AM, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > 2dd9c11b9d4 applies cleanly on top of 4.4 and works for me in the cxl
> > case. Mauricio - any objections from the pseries/dlpar side?
>
> No objections.
Thanks, have
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:29:23AM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> On 09/28/2016 05:45 AM, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > 2dd9c11b9d4 applies cleanly on top of 4.4 and works for me in the cxl
> > case. Mauricio - any objections from the pseries/dlpar side?
>
> No objections.
Thanks, have
On 09/28/2016 05:45 AM, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
2dd9c11b9d4 applies cleanly on top of 4.4 and works for me in the cxl
case. Mauricio - any objections from the pseries/dlpar side?
No objections.
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
On 09/28/2016 05:45 AM, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
2dd9c11b9d4 applies cleanly on top of 4.4 and works for me in the cxl
case. Mauricio - any objections from the pseries/dlpar side?
No objections.
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
On 24/09/16 01:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 05:11:48PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:25:33AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 09/23/2016 01:08 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 24/09/16 01:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 05:11:48PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:25:33AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 09/23/2016 01:08 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 09/22/2016 11:28 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
> There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 09/22/2016 11:28 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
> There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 05:11:48PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:25:33AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 09/23/2016 01:08 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > e5767a13d7cb ("cxl: use
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 05:11:48PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:25:33AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 09/23/2016 01:08 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > e5767a13d7cb ("cxl: use
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:25:33AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/23/2016 01:08 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > e5767a13d7cb ("cxl: use pcibios_free_controller_deferred() when removing
> > > vPHBs")
> > > does not apply
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:25:33AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/23/2016 01:08 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > e5767a13d7cb ("cxl: use pcibios_free_controller_deferred() when removing
> > > vPHBs")
> > > does not apply
On 09/23/2016 01:08 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
e5767a13d7cb ("cxl: use pcibios_free_controller_deferred() when removing vPHBs")
does not apply to v4.4 nor to v4.7 (and isn't marked stable ???).
I don't understand what
On 09/23/2016 01:08 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
e5767a13d7cb ("cxl: use pcibios_free_controller_deferred() when removing vPHBs")
does not apply to v4.4 nor to v4.7 (and isn't marked stable ???).
I don't understand what
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:43:27AM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 09/23/16 10:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:56:28PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> >> did you forget to add the -net patches in stable-queue.git/tree/net-4.4
> >> or are they on hold for some
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:43:27AM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 09/23/16 10:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:56:28PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> >> did you forget to add the -net patches in stable-queue.git/tree/net-4.4
> >> or are they on hold for some
On 09/23/16 10:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:56:28PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>> did you forget to add the -net patches in stable-queue.git/tree/net-4.4
>> or are they on hold for some reason? I think they were supposed to go
>> into .22.
>
> Really? I just
On 09/23/16 10:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:56:28PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>> did you forget to add the -net patches in stable-queue.git/tree/net-4.4
>> or are they on hold for some reason? I think they were supposed to go
>> into .22.
>
> Really? I just
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:56:28PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 09/22/16 19:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
> > There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:56:28PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 09/22/16 19:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
> > There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/22/2016 10:28 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
> > There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/22/2016 10:28 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
> > There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/22/2016 10:28 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
> > There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/22/2016 10:28 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
> > There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> e5767a13d7cb ("cxl: use pcibios_free_controller_deferred() when removing
> vPHBs")
> does not apply to v4.4 nor to v4.7 (and isn't marked stable ???).
I don't understand what you mean here. It did apply, and it was marked
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> e5767a13d7cb ("cxl: use pcibios_free_controller_deferred() when removing
> vPHBs")
> does not apply to v4.4 nor to v4.7 (and isn't marked stable ???).
I don't understand what you mean here. It did apply, and it was marked
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> ppc:
>
> 5b675d932899 ("ppc32: fix copy_from_user()")
> is corrupt in both v4.4 and v4.7.
Ugh, my fault, now fixed up.
greg k-h
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:01:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> ppc:
>
> 5b675d932899 ("ppc32: fix copy_from_user()")
> is corrupt in both v4.4 and v4.7.
Ugh, my fault, now fixed up.
greg k-h
On 09/22/2016 10:28 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On 09/22/2016 10:28 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 07:28:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
> There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 07:28:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
> There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On 09/22/16 19:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
> There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Greg,
did you
On 09/22/16 19:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
> There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Greg,
did you
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat Sep 24 17:29:17 UTC 2016.
Anything
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.22 release.
There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sat Sep 24 17:29:17 UTC 2016.
Anything
36 matches
Mail list logo
