From: Javed Hasan <jha...@marvell.com>

[ Upstream commit b2b0f16fa65e910a3ec8771206bb49ee87a54ac5 ]

A race condition exists between the response handler getting called because
of exchange_mgr_reset() (which clears out all the active XIDs) and the
response we get via an interrupt.

Sequence of events:

         rport ba0200: Port timeout, state PLOGI
         rport ba0200: Port entered PLOGI state from PLOGI state
         xid 1052: Exchange timer armed : 20000 msecs      xid timer armed here
         rport ba0200: Received LOGO request while in state PLOGI
         rport ba0200: Delete port
         rport ba0200: work event 3
         rport ba0200: lld callback ev 3
         bnx2fc: rport_event_hdlr: event = 3, port_id = 0xba0200
         bnx2fc: ba0200 - rport not created Yet!!
         /* Here we reset any outstanding exchanges before
         freeing rport using the exch_mgr_reset() */
         xid 1052: Exchange timer canceled
         /* Here we got two responses for one xid */
         xid 1052: invoking resp(), esb 20000000 state 3
         xid 1052: invoking resp(), esb 20000000 state 3
         xid 1052: fc_rport_plogi_resp() : ep->resp_active 2
         xid 1052: fc_rport_plogi_resp() : ep->resp_active 2

Skip the response if the exchange is already completed.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201215194731.2326-1-jha...@marvell.com
Signed-off-by: Javed Hasan <jha...@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.peter...@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
index d0a86ef806522..59fd6101f188b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
@@ -1585,8 +1585,13 @@ static void fc_exch_recv_seq_resp(struct fc_exch_mgr 
*mp, struct fc_frame *fp)
                rc = fc_exch_done_locked(ep);
                WARN_ON(fc_seq_exch(sp) != ep);
                spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
-               if (!rc)
+               if (!rc) {
                        fc_exch_delete(ep);
+               } else {
+                       FC_EXCH_DBG(ep, "ep is completed already,"
+                                       "hence skip calling the resp\n");
+                       goto skip_resp;
+               }
        }
 
        /*
@@ -1605,6 +1610,7 @@ static void fc_exch_recv_seq_resp(struct fc_exch_mgr *mp, 
struct fc_frame *fp)
        if (!fc_invoke_resp(ep, sp, fp))
                fc_frame_free(fp);
 
+skip_resp:
        fc_exch_release(ep);
        return;
 rel:
@@ -1848,10 +1854,16 @@ static void fc_exch_reset(struct fc_exch *ep)
 
        fc_exch_hold(ep);
 
-       if (!rc)
+       if (!rc) {
                fc_exch_delete(ep);
+       } else {
+               FC_EXCH_DBG(ep, "ep is completed already,"
+                               "hence skip calling the resp\n");
+               goto skip_resp;
+       }
 
        fc_invoke_resp(ep, sp, ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED));
+skip_resp:
        fc_seq_set_resp(sp, NULL, ep->arg);
        fc_exch_release(ep);
 }
-- 
2.27.0



Reply via email to