On Sat, 17 February 2007 21:02:17 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> That just sounds like we need Jörn to get off his butt and finish logfs ;)
He's working on it this very moment. Help in debugging would be
appreciated, if progress is too slow for people. That part seems to
consume a lot of time and
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 23:37 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Which brings be back to my original point ;-)
>
> I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I'd still like to understand
> what is so special with 'static UBI volumes' that they can't be used with
> a slightly extended MTD interface.
Le
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 23:37 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 18 February 2007 04:02:17 Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 03:15:23AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Sunday 18 February 2007 03:04, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > No, the MTD interface isn't flawed. gluebi is present
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 22:14 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This approach doesn't seem to make sense at all. If the MTD device interface
> is flawed, the right approach should be to fix that instead. After all,
> there are not many users of the MTD interface, so you should be able to
> adapt them.
M
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 08:04:30PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> No, the MTD interface isn't flawed. gluebi is present to make things like
> JFFS2 work on top of UBI volumes with very little adaptations. If you go
> changing _every_ MTD user to now use either an MTD device or a native UBI
> device,
On Sunday 18 February 2007 04:02:17 Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 03:15:23AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Sunday 18 February 2007 03:04, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > No, the MTD interface isn't flawed. gluebi is present to make things
> > > like JFFS2 work on top of UBI volumes with
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 03:15:23AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 18 February 2007 03:04, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > No, the MTD interface isn't flawed. gluebi is present to make things like
> > JFFS2 work on top of UBI volumes with very little adaptations. If you go
> > changing _every_ MTD
On Sunday 18 February 2007 03:04, Josh Boyer wrote:
> No, the MTD interface isn't flawed. gluebi is present to make things like
> JFFS2 work on top of UBI volumes with very little adaptations. If you go
> changing _every_ MTD user to now use either an MTD device or a native UBI
> device, then the
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 10:14:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 17 February 2007 17:57, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > + * This unit is responsible for emulating MTD devices on top of UBI
> > devices.
> > + * This sounds strange, but it is in fact quite useful to make legacy
> > softwar
On Saturday 17 February 2007 17:57, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> + * This unit is responsible for emulating MTD devices on top of UBI devices.
> + * This sounds strange, but it is in fact quite useful to make legacy
> software
> + * work on top of UBI. New software should use native UBI API instead.
diff -auNrp tmp-from/drivers/mtd/ubi/gluebi.h tmp-to/drivers/mtd/ubi/gluebi.h
--- tmp-from/drivers/mtd/ubi/gluebi.h 1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200
+++ tmp-to/drivers/mtd/ubi/gluebi.h 2007-02-17 18:07:28.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) International Business Machine
11 matches
Mail list logo
