On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri 11-05-18 21:59:20, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
>> Subsequent patches in the series convert inode timestamps
>> to use struct timespec64 instead of struct timespec as
>> part of solving the y2038 problem.
>>
>> commit
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri 11-05-18 21:59:20, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
>> Subsequent patches in the series convert inode timestamps
>> to use struct timespec64 instead of struct timespec as
>> part of solving the y2038 problem.
>>
>> commit fd3cfad374d4
Hello,
On Fri 11-05-18 21:59:20, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> Subsequent patches in the series convert inode timestamps
> to use struct timespec64 instead of struct timespec as
> part of solving the y2038 problem.
>
> commit fd3cfad374d4 ("udf: Convert udf_disk_stamp_to_time() to use
> mktime64()")
Hello,
On Fri 11-05-18 21:59:20, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> Subsequent patches in the series convert inode timestamps
> to use struct timespec64 instead of struct timespec as
> part of solving the y2038 problem.
>
> commit fd3cfad374d4 ("udf: Convert udf_disk_stamp_to_time() to use
> mktime64()")
Subsequent patches in the series convert inode timestamps
to use struct timespec64 instead of struct timespec as
part of solving the y2038 problem.
commit fd3cfad374d4 ("udf: Convert udf_disk_stamp_to_time() to use mktime64()")
eliminated the NULL return condition from udf_disk_stamp_to_time().
Subsequent patches in the series convert inode timestamps
to use struct timespec64 instead of struct timespec as
part of solving the y2038 problem.
commit fd3cfad374d4 ("udf: Convert udf_disk_stamp_to_time() to use mktime64()")
eliminated the NULL return condition from udf_disk_stamp_to_time().
6 matches
Mail list logo