On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:50:14AM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Christoffer Dall writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:10:03PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >> This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
> >> will manipulate guest registers before restarting any
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:50:14AM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
Christoffer Dall christoffer.d...@linaro.org writes:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:10:03PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
will manipulate guest registers before
Christoffer Dall writes:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:10:03PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
>> will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
>> registers has to occur just before control is passed back
Christoffer Dall christoffer.d...@linaro.org writes:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:10:03PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
registers has to occur just before
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:10:03PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
> will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
> registers has to occur just before control is passed back to the guest.
> Furthermore while
On 30 November 2014 at 10:10, Christoffer Dall
wrote:
> In any case, I think it was related to how userspace observes the state
> of the CPU, because when you do the MMIO operation emulation in
> userspace, currently if you observe the PC though GET_ONE_REG, you'll
> see a PC pointing to the next
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:27:06PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 November 2014 at 16:10, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
> > will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
> > registers has to occur just
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:27:06PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 25 November 2014 at 16:10, Alex Bennée alex.ben...@linaro.org wrote:
This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
registers has to
On 30 November 2014 at 10:10, Christoffer Dall
christoffer.d...@linaro.org wrote:
In any case, I think it was related to how userspace observes the state
of the CPU, because when you do the MMIO operation emulation in
userspace, currently if you observe the PC though GET_ONE_REG, you'll
see a
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:10:03PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
registers has to occur just before control is passed back to the guest.
Furthermore while
On 25 November 2014 at 16:10, Alex Bennée wrote:
> This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
> will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
> registers has to occur just before control is passed back to the guest.
> Furthermore while guest
Andrew Jones writes:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:10:03PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
>> will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
>> registers has to occur just before control is passed back to
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:10:03PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
> will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
> registers has to occur just before control is passed back to the guest.
> Furthermore while
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:10:03PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
registers has to occur just before control is passed back to the guest.
Furthermore while
Andrew Jones drjo...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:10:03PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
registers has to occur just before control is
On 25 November 2014 at 16:10, Alex Bennée alex.ben...@linaro.org wrote:
This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
registers has to occur just before control is passed back to the guest.
This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
registers has to occur just before control is passed back to the guest.
Furthermore while guest debugging is in effect we need to squash the
ability of the
This adds support for single-stepping the guest. As userspace can and
will manipulate guest registers before restarting any tweaking of the
registers has to occur just before control is passed back to the guest.
Furthermore while guest debugging is in effect we need to squash the
ability of the
18 matches
Mail list logo