Re: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: shmobile: mark mackerel sh_mmcif_device __maybe_unused

2013-02-15 Thread Simon Horman
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:55:06PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 14 February 2013, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:26:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > Patch eac036ef9e "ARM: shmobile: streamline mackerel SD and MMC devices" > > > made the use of the

Re: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: shmobile: mark mackerel sh_mmcif_device __maybe_unused

2013-02-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 14 February 2013, Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:26:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Patch eac036ef9e "ARM: shmobile: streamline mackerel SD and MMC devices" > > made the use of the sh_mmcif_device variable for mackarel optional, > > but the definition is always

Re: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: shmobile: mark mackerel sh_mmcif_device __maybe_unused

2013-02-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 14 February 2013, Simon Horman wrote: On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:26:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: Patch eac036ef9e ARM: shmobile: streamline mackerel SD and MMC devices made the use of the sh_mmcif_device variable for mackarel optional, but the definition is always provided,

Re: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: shmobile: mark mackerel sh_mmcif_device __maybe_unused

2013-02-15 Thread Simon Horman
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:55:06PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Thursday 14 February 2013, Simon Horman wrote: On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:26:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: Patch eac036ef9e ARM: shmobile: streamline mackerel SD and MMC devices made the use of the sh_mmcif_device

Re: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: shmobile: mark mackerel sh_mmcif_device __maybe_unused

2013-02-14 Thread Simon Horman
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:26:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Patch eac036ef9e "ARM: shmobile: streamline mackerel SD and MMC devices" > made the use of the sh_mmcif_device variable for mackarel optional, > but the definition is always provided, causing a build warning. > >

[PATCH 5/9] ARM: shmobile: mark mackerel sh_mmcif_device __maybe_unused

2013-02-14 Thread Arnd Bergmann
Patch eac036ef9e "ARM: shmobile: streamline mackerel SD and MMC devices" made the use of the sh_mmcif_device variable for mackarel optional, but the definition is always provided, causing a build warning. arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-mackerel.c:1120:31: warning: 'sh_mmcif_device' defined

[PATCH 5/9] ARM: shmobile: mark mackerel sh_mmcif_device __maybe_unused

2013-02-14 Thread Arnd Bergmann
Patch eac036ef9e ARM: shmobile: streamline mackerel SD and MMC devices made the use of the sh_mmcif_device variable for mackarel optional, but the definition is always provided, causing a build warning. arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-mackerel.c:1120:31: warning: 'sh_mmcif_device' defined

Re: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: shmobile: mark mackerel sh_mmcif_device __maybe_unused

2013-02-14 Thread Simon Horman
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:26:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: Patch eac036ef9e ARM: shmobile: streamline mackerel SD and MMC devices made the use of the sh_mmcif_device variable for mackarel optional, but the definition is always provided, causing a build warning.