On 14.1.2014 22:46, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 01:40:15PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:56:53PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> Dne 3.1.2014 22:00, Josh Triplett napsal(a):
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:55:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 3.1.2014
On 14.1.2014 22:46, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 01:40:15PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:56:53PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
Dne 3.1.2014 22:00, Josh Triplett napsal(a):
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:55:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
On 3.1.2014 21:29, Josh
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 01:40:15PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:56:53PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> > Dne 3.1.2014 22:00, Josh Triplett napsal(a):
> > > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:55:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> > >> On 3.1.2014 21:29, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > >>>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:56:53PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 3.1.2014 22:00, Josh Triplett napsal(a):
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:55:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> >> On 3.1.2014 21:29, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >>> Please feel free to take the entire series through your tree; I received
Dne 3.1.2014 22:00, Josh Triplett napsal(a):
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:55:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>> On 3.1.2014 21:29, Josh Triplett wrote:
>>> Please feel free to take the entire series through your tree; I received
>>> some maintainer acks, but no indications that the patches are
Dne 3.1.2014 22:00, Josh Triplett napsal(a):
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:55:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
On 3.1.2014 21:29, Josh Triplett wrote:
Please feel free to take the entire series through your tree; I received
some maintainer acks, but no indications that the patches are going
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:56:53PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
Dne 3.1.2014 22:00, Josh Triplett napsal(a):
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:55:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
On 3.1.2014 21:29, Josh Triplett wrote:
Please feel free to take the entire series through your tree; I received
some
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 01:40:15PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:56:53PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
Dne 3.1.2014 22:00, Josh Triplett napsal(a):
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:55:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
On 3.1.2014 21:29, Josh Triplett wrote:
Please feel
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:55:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 3.1.2014 21:29, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Please feel free to take the entire series through your tree; I received
> > some maintainer acks, but no indications that the patches are going
> > through their trees.
>
> OK. I will wait
On 3.1.2014 21:29, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Please feel free to take the entire series through your tree; I received
> some maintainer acks, but no indications that the patches are going
> through their trees.
OK. I will wait until mid next week and commit with any acks received.
Michal
--
To
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 05:40:52PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 2013-12-23 22:56, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > GCC 4.9 and newer have a new warning -Wdate-time, which warns on any use
> > of __DATE__, __TIME__, or __TIMESTAMP__, which would make the build
> > non-deterministic. Now that the kernel
On 2013-12-23 22:56, Josh Triplett wrote:
> GCC 4.9 and newer have a new warning -Wdate-time, which warns on any use
> of __DATE__, __TIME__, or __TIMESTAMP__, which would make the build
> non-deterministic. Now that the kernel does not use any of those
> macros, turn on -Werror=date-time if
On 2013-12-23 22:56, Josh Triplett wrote:
GCC 4.9 and newer have a new warning -Wdate-time, which warns on any use
of __DATE__, __TIME__, or __TIMESTAMP__, which would make the build
non-deterministic. Now that the kernel does not use any of those
macros, turn on -Werror=date-time if
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 05:40:52PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
On 2013-12-23 22:56, Josh Triplett wrote:
GCC 4.9 and newer have a new warning -Wdate-time, which warns on any use
of __DATE__, __TIME__, or __TIMESTAMP__, which would make the build
non-deterministic. Now that the kernel does
On 3.1.2014 21:29, Josh Triplett wrote:
Please feel free to take the entire series through your tree; I received
some maintainer acks, but no indications that the patches are going
through their trees.
OK. I will wait until mid next week and commit with any acks received.
Michal
--
To
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:55:16PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
On 3.1.2014 21:29, Josh Triplett wrote:
Please feel free to take the entire series through your tree; I received
some maintainer acks, but no indications that the patches are going
through their trees.
OK. I will wait until
GCC 4.9 and newer have a new warning -Wdate-time, which warns on any use
of __DATE__, __TIME__, or __TIMESTAMP__, which would make the build
non-deterministic. Now that the kernel does not use any of those
macros, turn on -Werror=date-time if available, to keep it that way.
The kernel already
GCC 4.9 and newer have a new warning -Wdate-time, which warns on any use
of __DATE__, __TIME__, or __TIMESTAMP__, which would make the build
non-deterministic. Now that the kernel does not use any of those
macros, turn on -Werror=date-time if available, to keep it that way.
The kernel already
18 matches
Mail list logo