From: Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 2d84a2d19b6150c6dbac1e6ebad9c82e4c123772 ]

In current fuse_drop_waiting() implementation it's possible that
fuse_wait_aborted() will not be woken up in the unlikely case that
fuse_abort_conn() + fuse_wait_aborted() runs in between checking
fc->connected and calling atomic_dec(&fc->num_waiting).

Do the atomic_dec_and_test() unconditionally, which also provides the
necessary barrier against reordering with the fc->connected check.

The explicit smp_mb() in fuse_wait_aborted() is not actually needed, since
the spin_unlock() in fuse_abort_conn() provides the necessary RELEASE
barrier after resetting fc->connected.  However, this is not a performance
sensitive path, and adding the explicit barrier makes it easier to
document.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@redhat.com>
Fixes: b8f95e5d13f5 ("fuse: umount should wait for all requests")
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> #v4.19
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
---
 fs/fuse/dev.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index 63fd33383413..af78ceead2dc 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -133,9 +133,13 @@ static bool fuse_block_alloc(struct fuse_conn *fc, bool 
for_background)
 
 static void fuse_drop_waiting(struct fuse_conn *fc)
 {
-       if (fc->connected) {
-               atomic_dec(&fc->num_waiting);
-       } else if (atomic_dec_and_test(&fc->num_waiting)) {
+       /*
+        * lockess check of fc->connected is okay, because atomic_dec_and_test()
+        * provides a memory barrier mached with the one in fuse_wait_aborted()
+        * to ensure no wake-up is missed.
+        */
+       if (atomic_dec_and_test(&fc->num_waiting) &&
+           !READ_ONCE(fc->connected)) {
                /* wake up aborters */
                wake_up_all(&fc->blocked_waitq);
        }
@@ -2170,6 +2174,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_abort_conn);
 
 void fuse_wait_aborted(struct fuse_conn *fc)
 {
+       /* matches implicit memory barrier in fuse_drop_waiting() */
+       smp_mb();
        wait_event(fc->blocked_waitq, atomic_read(&fc->num_waiting) == 0);
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to