Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 08/65] btrfs: cleaner_kthread() doesn't need explicit freeze

2018-10-26 Thread Sasha Levin
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 08:58:57AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Sasha Levin wrote: >> cleaner_kthread() is not marked freezable, and therefore calling >> try_to_freeze() in its context is a pointless no-op. >> >> In addition to that, as has been clearly demonstrated by

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 08/65] btrfs: cleaner_kthread() doesn't need explicit freeze

2018-10-26 Thread Sasha Levin
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 08:58:57AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Sasha Levin wrote: >> cleaner_kthread() is not marked freezable, and therefore calling >> try_to_freeze() in its context is a pointless no-op. >> >> In addition to that, as has been clearly demonstrated by

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 08/65] btrfs: cleaner_kthread() doesn't need explicit freeze

2018-10-26 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> cleaner_kthread() is not marked freezable, and therefore calling > >> try_to_freeze() in its context is a pointless no-op. > >> > >> In addition to that, as has been clearly demonstrated by 80ad623edd2d > >> ("Revert "btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 08/65] btrfs: cleaner_kthread() doesn't need explicit freeze

2018-10-26 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> cleaner_kthread() is not marked freezable, and therefore calling > >> try_to_freeze() in its context is a pointless no-op. > >> > >> In addition to that, as has been clearly demonstrated by 80ad623edd2d > >> ("Revert "btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 08/65] btrfs: cleaner_kthread() doesn't need explicit freeze

2018-10-25 Thread Sasha Levin
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:07:29PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:16:08AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: From: Jiri Kosina [ Upstream commit 838fe1887765f4cc679febea60d87d2a06bd300e ] cleaner_kthread() is not marked freezable, and therefore calling try_to_freeze() in its

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 08/65] btrfs: cleaner_kthread() doesn't need explicit freeze

2018-10-25 Thread Sasha Levin
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:07:29PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:16:08AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: From: Jiri Kosina [ Upstream commit 838fe1887765f4cc679febea60d87d2a06bd300e ] cleaner_kthread() is not marked freezable, and therefore calling try_to_freeze() in its

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 08/65] btrfs: cleaner_kthread() doesn't need explicit freeze

2018-10-25 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:16:08AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > From: Jiri Kosina > > [ Upstream commit 838fe1887765f4cc679febea60d87d2a06bd300e ] > > cleaner_kthread() is not marked freezable, and therefore calling > try_to_freeze() in its context is a pointless no-op. > > In addition to that,

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 08/65] btrfs: cleaner_kthread() doesn't need explicit freeze

2018-10-25 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:16:08AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > From: Jiri Kosina > > [ Upstream commit 838fe1887765f4cc679febea60d87d2a06bd300e ] > > cleaner_kthread() is not marked freezable, and therefore calling > try_to_freeze() in its context is a pointless no-op. > > In addition to that,

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 08/65] btrfs: cleaner_kthread() doesn't need explicit freeze

2018-10-25 Thread Sasha Levin
From: Jiri Kosina [ Upstream commit 838fe1887765f4cc679febea60d87d2a06bd300e ] cleaner_kthread() is not marked freezable, and therefore calling try_to_freeze() in its context is a pointless no-op. In addition to that, as has been clearly demonstrated by 80ad623edd2d ("Revert "btrfs: clear

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 08/65] btrfs: cleaner_kthread() doesn't need explicit freeze

2018-10-25 Thread Sasha Levin
From: Jiri Kosina [ Upstream commit 838fe1887765f4cc679febea60d87d2a06bd300e ] cleaner_kthread() is not marked freezable, and therefore calling try_to_freeze() in its context is a pointless no-op. In addition to that, as has been clearly demonstrated by 80ad623edd2d ("Revert "btrfs: clear