[PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.15 151/189] perf evsel: Fix period/freq terms setup

[Sasha Levin]

From: Jiri Olsa 

[ Upstream commit 49c0ae80eb32426fa133246200628e529067c595 ]

Stephane reported that we don't set properly PERIOD sample type for
events with period term defined.

Before:
  $ perf record -e cpu/cpu-cycles,period=1000/u ls
  $ perf evlist -v
  cpu/cpu-cycles,period=1000/u: ... sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|PERIOD, ...

After:
  $ perf record -e cpu/cpu-cycles,period=1000/u ls
  $ perf evlist -v
  cpu/cpu-cycles,period=1000/u: ... sample_type: IP|TID|TIME, ...

Setting PERIOD sample type based on period term setup.

Committer note:

When we use -c or a period=N term in the event definition, then we don't
need to ask the kernel, for this event, via perf_event_attr.sample_type
|= PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD, to put the event period in each sample for this
event, as we know it already, it is in perf_event_attr.sample_period.

Reported-by: Stephane Eranian 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa 
Tested-by: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc: David Ahern 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180201083812.11359-2-jo...@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
---
 tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index d23a8c51b307..7349a5d22464 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -736,12 +736,14 @@ static void apply_config_terms(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
if (!(term->weak && opts->user_interval != ULLONG_MAX)) 
{
attr->sample_period = term->val.period;
attr->freq = 0;
+   perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD);
}
break;
case PERF_EVSEL__CONFIG_TERM_FREQ:
if (!(term->weak && opts->user_freq != UINT_MAX)) {
attr->sample_freq = term->val.freq;
attr->freq = 1;
+   perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD);
}
break;
case PERF_EVSEL__CONFIG_TERM_TIME:
-- 
2.15.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.15 151/189] perf evsel: Fix period/freq terms setup

[Sasha Levin]

From: Jiri Olsa 

[ Upstream commit 49c0ae80eb32426fa133246200628e529067c595 ]

Stephane reported that we don't set properly PERIOD sample type for
events with period term defined.

Before:
  $ perf record -e cpu/cpu-cycles,period=1000/u ls
  $ perf evlist -v
  cpu/cpu-cycles,period=1000/u: ... sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|PERIOD, ...

After:
  $ perf record -e cpu/cpu-cycles,period=1000/u ls
  $ perf evlist -v
  cpu/cpu-cycles,period=1000/u: ... sample_type: IP|TID|TIME, ...

Setting PERIOD sample type based on period term setup.

Committer note:

When we use -c or a period=N term in the event definition, then we don't
need to ask the kernel, for this event, via perf_event_attr.sample_type
|= PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD, to put the event period in each sample for this
event, as we know it already, it is in perf_event_attr.sample_period.

Reported-by: Stephane Eranian 
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa 
Tested-by: Stephane Eranian 
Cc: Alexander Shishkin 
Cc: Andi Kleen 
Cc: David Ahern 
Cc: Namhyung Kim 
Cc: Peter Zijlstra 
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180201083812.11359-2-jo...@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin 
---
 tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index d23a8c51b307..7349a5d22464 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -736,12 +736,14 @@ static void apply_config_terms(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
if (!(term->weak && opts->user_interval != ULLONG_MAX)) 
{
attr->sample_period = term->val.period;
attr->freq = 0;
+   perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD);
}
break;
case PERF_EVSEL__CONFIG_TERM_FREQ:
if (!(term->weak && opts->user_freq != UINT_MAX)) {
attr->sample_freq = term->val.freq;
attr->freq = 1;
+   perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD);
}
break;
case PERF_EVSEL__CONFIG_TERM_TIME:
-- 
2.15.1