On 17 March 2015 at 08:22, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ian Malone wrote:
>
>> Looks like Ingo Molnar has committed to tip which is probably a good
>> sign, thanks all.
>> (Have to hand this system on to someone who wont be patching kernels...)
>
> Guys, since I don't have the affected hardware,
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 09:22 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ian Malone wrote:
>
> > On 15 March 2015 at 04:53, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 23:44 +, Ian Malone wrote:
> > >> On 18 January 2014 at 16:14, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > >> > On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:33 +0100,
* Ian Malone wrote:
> On 15 March 2015 at 04:53, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 23:44 +, Ian Malone wrote:
> >> On 18 January 2014 at 16:14, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >> > On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:33 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 05:20 +0100,
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 09:22 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 March 2015 at 04:53, Mike Galbraith umgwanakikb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 23:44 +, Ian Malone wrote:
On 18 January 2014 at 16:14, Mike Galbraith bitbuc...@online.de
* Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 March 2015 at 04:53, Mike Galbraith umgwanakikb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 23:44 +, Ian Malone wrote:
On 18 January 2014 at 16:14, Mike Galbraith bitbuc...@online.de wrote:
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:33 +0100, Mike Galbraith
On 17 March 2015 at 08:22, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like Ingo Molnar has committed to tip which is probably a good
sign, thanks all.
(Have to hand this system on to someone who wont be patching kernels...)
Guys, since I don't have
On 15 March 2015 at 04:53, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 23:44 +, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 18 January 2014 at 16:14, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:33 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 05:20 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>
>> >
On 15 March 2015 at 04:53, Mike Galbraith umgwanakikb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 23:44 +, Ian Malone wrote:
On 18 January 2014 at 16:14, Mike Galbraith bitbuc...@online.de wrote:
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:33 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 05:20 +0100,
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 23:44 +, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 18 January 2014 at 16:14, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:33 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 05:20 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith
> > Cc: # 3.10+
> > ---
> >
On 18 January 2014 at 16:14, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:33 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 05:20 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith
> Cc: # 3.10+
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c |9 ++---
> 1 file changed, 6
On 18 January 2014 at 16:14, Mike Galbraith bitbuc...@online.de wrote:
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:33 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 05:20 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith bitbuc...@online.de
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 3.10+
---
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 23:44 +, Ian Malone wrote:
On 18 January 2014 at 16:14, Mike Galbraith bitbuc...@online.de wrote:
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:33 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 05:20 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith bitbuc...@online.de
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:33 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 05:20 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > taskset 0xc pipe-test 1
> >
> > 3.8.13 3.397977 usecs/loop -- avg 3.400336 588.2 KHz
> > master+4.798547 usecs/loop -- avg 4.791692 417.4 KHz
>
> Bah, those are
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 05:20 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> taskset 0xc pipe-test 1
>
> 3.8.13 3.397977 usecs/loop -- avg 3.400336 588.2 KHz
> master+4.798547 usecs/loop -- avg 4.791692 417.4 KHz
Bah, those are apple/grape, these are apple/apple.
idle: kill unnecessary mwait_idle()
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 05:20 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
taskset 0xc pipe-test 1
3.8.13 3.397977 usecs/loop -- avg 3.400336 588.2 KHz
master+4.798547 usecs/loop -- avg 4.791692 417.4 KHz
Bah, those are apple/grape, these are apple/apple.
idle: kill unnecessary mwait_idle() resched
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:33 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 05:20 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
taskset 0xc pipe-test 1
3.8.13 3.397977 usecs/loop -- avg 3.400336 588.2 KHz
master+4.798547 usecs/loop -- avg 4.791692 417.4 KHz
Bah, those are apple/grape,
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:00 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On 01/14/2014 09:37 PM, Len Brown wrote:
> > From: Len Brown
> >
> > In Linux-3.9 we removed the mwait_idle() loop:
> > 'x86 idle: remove mwait_idle() and "idle=mwait" cmdline param'
> > (69fb3676df3329a7142803bb3502fa59dc0db2e3)
> >
>
On 01/14/2014 09:37 PM, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown
>
> In Linux-3.9 we removed the mwait_idle() loop:
> 'x86 idle: remove mwait_idle() and "idle=mwait" cmdline param'
> (69fb3676df3329a7142803bb3502fa59dc0db2e3)
>
> The reasoning was that modern machines should be sufficiently
> happy
On 01/14/2014 09:37 PM, Len Brown wrote:
From: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
In Linux-3.9 we removed the mwait_idle() loop:
'x86 idle: remove mwait_idle() and idle=mwait cmdline param'
(69fb3676df3329a7142803bb3502fa59dc0db2e3)
The reasoning was that modern machines should be sufficiently
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:00 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On 01/14/2014 09:37 PM, Len Brown wrote:
From: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
In Linux-3.9 we removed the mwait_idle() loop:
'x86 idle: remove mwait_idle() and idle=mwait cmdline param'
(69fb3676df3329a7142803bb3502fa59dc0db2e3)
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 00:37 -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown
>
> In Linux-3.9 we removed the mwait_idle() loop:
> 'x86 idle: remove mwait_idle() and "idle=mwait" cmdline param'
> (69fb3676df3329a7142803bb3502fa59dc0db2e3)
>
> The reasoning was that modern machines should be
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 00:37 -0500, Len Brown wrote:
From: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
In Linux-3.9 we removed the mwait_idle() loop:
'x86 idle: remove mwait_idle() and idle=mwait cmdline param'
(69fb3676df3329a7142803bb3502fa59dc0db2e3)
The reasoning was that modern machines should be
From: Len Brown
In Linux-3.9 we removed the mwait_idle() loop:
'x86 idle: remove mwait_idle() and "idle=mwait" cmdline param'
(69fb3676df3329a7142803bb3502fa59dc0db2e3)
The reasoning was that modern machines should be sufficiently
happy during the boot process using the default_idle() HALT
From: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
In Linux-3.9 we removed the mwait_idle() loop:
'x86 idle: remove mwait_idle() and idle=mwait cmdline param'
(69fb3676df3329a7142803bb3502fa59dc0db2e3)
The reasoning was that modern machines should be sufficiently
happy during the boot process using the
24 matches
Mail list logo
