On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 02:16:51PM +, Aisheng Dong wrote:
> > From: Jonathan Neuschäfer [mailto:j.neuschae...@gmx.net]
> >
> > There are a few differences between the i.MX50 clock tree and those of
> > i.MX51 and i.MX53 that are not yet handled in clk-imx51-imx53.c.
> > This patch handles the
> From: Jonathan Neuschäfer [mailto:j.neuschae...@gmx.net]
>
> There are a few differences between the i.MX50 clock tree and those of
> i.MX51 and i.MX53 that are not yet handled in clk-imx51-imx53.c.
> This patch handles the following differences:
>
> - i.MX50 does not have a periph_apm clock.
There are a few differences between the i.MX50 clock tree and those of
i.MX51 and i.MX53 that are not yet handled in clk-imx51-imx53.c.
This patch handles the following differences:
- i.MX50 does not have a periph_apm clock. Instead, the main bus clock
(a.k.a. periph_clk) comes directly from a
3 matches
Mail list logo
