Hi Steve,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:25:16 -0700
> Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>> Gentle ping. Could you anyone pick up this patch?
>>
>>
>
> Thanks for the reminder. As this isn't a regression (it never
Hi Steve,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:25:16 -0700
> Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>> Gentle ping. Could you anyone pick up this patch?
>>
>>
>
> Thanks for the reminder. As this isn't a regression (it never
> worked ;-) do you think this should go
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:25:16 -0700
Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Gentle ping. Could you anyone pick up this patch?
>
>
Thanks for the reminder. As this isn't a regression (it never
worked ;-) do you think this should go to the stable releases, and/or
even the current release.
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:25:16 -0700
Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Gentle ping. Could you anyone pick up this patch?
>
>
Thanks for the reminder. As this isn't a regression (it never
worked ;-) do you think this should go to the stable releases, and/or
even the current release. Or are you fine with
Function graph tracer currently ignores filters if tracing_thresh is set.
For example, even if set_ftrace_pid is set, then its ignored if tracing_thresh
set, resulting in all processes being traced.
To fix this, we reuse the same entry function as when tracing_thresh is not
set and do everything
Function graph tracer currently ignores filters if tracing_thresh is set.
For example, even if set_ftrace_pid is set, then its ignored if tracing_thresh
set, resulting in all processes being traced.
To fix this, we reuse the same entry function as when tracing_thresh is not
set and do everything
6 matches
Mail list logo