On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:47:57AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > I don't really see the use of the ranges thing, CPU enumeration just
> > isn't sane like that. Also, I should really add that randomization pass
> > to the CPU enumeration :-)
>
> Please don't!!!
Why not, the BIOS more or less
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:16:50PM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:50 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Aside from the comments Yury made, on how all this is better in
> > bitmap_parselist(), how about doing s/last/N/ here? For me something
> > like: "4-N" reads much saner than
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 03:59:42PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:47:57AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > I don't really see the use of the ranges thing, CPU enumeration just
> > > isn't sane like that. Also, I should really add that randomization pass
> > > to the
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 03:18:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:16:50PM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:50 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > > Aside from the comments Yury made, on how all this is better in
> > > bitmap_parselist(), how about doing
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 03:18:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:16:50PM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:50 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > > Aside from the comments Yury made, on how all this is better in
> > > bitmap_parselist(), how about doing
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:50 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 04:49:55PM -0800, paul...@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Paul Gortmaker
> >
> > It seems that a common configuration is to use the 1st couple cores
> > for housekeeping tasks, and or driving a busy peripheral that
[Re: [PATCH RFC cpumask 4/5] cpumask: Add "last" alias for cpu list
specifications] On 06/01/2021 (Wed 10:49) Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 04:49:55PM -0800, paul...@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Paul Gortmaker
> >
> > It seems that a common
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 04:49:55PM -0800, paul...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Paul Gortmaker
>
> It seems that a common configuration is to use the 1st couple cores
> for housekeeping tasks, and or driving a busy peripheral that generates
> a lot of interrupts, or something similar.
>
> This
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:49 PM wrote:
>
> From: Paul Gortmaker
>
> It seems that a common configuration is to use the 1st couple cores
> for housekeeping tasks, and or driving a busy peripheral that generates
> a lot of interrupts, or something similar.
>
> This tends to leave the remaining ones
From: Paul Gortmaker
It seems that a common configuration is to use the 1st couple cores
for housekeeping tasks, and or driving a busy peripheral that generates
a lot of interrupts, or something similar.
This tends to leave the remaining ones to form a pool of similarly
configured cores to take
10 matches
Mail list logo
