Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/6] proc: support mounting private procfs instances inside same pid namespace

2017-05-03 Thread Djalal Harouni
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Djalal Harouni

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/6] proc: support mounting private procfs instances inside same pid namespace

2017-05-03 Thread Djalal Harouni
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: >> [...] We have to align procfs and modernize it to have a

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/6] proc: support mounting private procfs instances inside same pid namespace

2017-05-02 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: > [...] >>> We have to align procfs and modernize it to have a per

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/6] proc: support mounting private procfs instances inside same pid namespace

2017-05-02 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: > [...] >>> We have to align procfs and modernize it to have a per mount context >>> where at least the mount option do not

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/6] proc: support mounting private procfs instances inside same pid namespace

2017-05-02 Thread Djalal Harouni
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: [...] >> We have to align procfs and modernize it to have a per mount context >> where at least the mount option do not propagate to all other

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/6] proc: support mounting private procfs instances inside same pid namespace

2017-05-02 Thread Djalal Harouni
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: [...] >> We have to align procfs and modernize it to have a per mount context >> where at least the mount option do not propagate to all other mounts, >> then maybe we can continue

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/6] proc: support mounting private procfs instances inside same pid namespace

2017-04-26 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: > This patch allows to have multiple private procfs instances inside the > same pid namespace. Lot of other areas in the kernel and filesystems > have been updated to be able to support private instances, devpts is one >

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 4/6] proc: support mounting private procfs instances inside same pid namespace

2017-04-26 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: > This patch allows to have multiple private procfs instances inside the > same pid namespace. Lot of other areas in the kernel and filesystems > have been updated to be able to support private instances, devpts is one > major example. The

[PATCH RFC v2 4/6] proc: support mounting private procfs instances inside same pid namespace

2017-04-25 Thread Djalal Harouni
This patch allows to have multiple private procfs instances inside the same pid namespace. Lot of other areas in the kernel and filesystems have been updated to be able to support private instances, devpts is one major example. The aim here is lightweight sandboxes, and to allow that we have to

[PATCH RFC v2 4/6] proc: support mounting private procfs instances inside same pid namespace

2017-04-25 Thread Djalal Harouni
This patch allows to have multiple private procfs instances inside the same pid namespace. Lot of other areas in the kernel and filesystems have been updated to be able to support private instances, devpts is one major example. The aim here is lightweight sandboxes, and to allow that we have to