It's good to me, thanks.
>+LKML
>
>Axel, please always include LKML on any patch.
>
>Qipeng, any concerns?
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:54:08AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> Use platform_device_register_full() instead of open-coded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
> ---
>
It's good to me, thanks.
>+LKML
>
>Axel, please always include LKML on any patch.
>
>Qipeng, any concerns?
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:54:08AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> Use platform_device_register_full() instead of open-coded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
> ---
>
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:59:55AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> 2016-09-29 7:36 GMT+08:00 Darren Hart :
> > +LKML
> >
> > Axel, please always include LKML on any patch.
>
> I thought +LKML is optional if you already have a dedicated
> platform-driver-x86 maillist.
Nope, LKML
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:59:55AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> 2016-09-29 7:36 GMT+08:00 Darren Hart :
> > +LKML
> >
> > Axel, please always include LKML on any patch.
>
> I thought +LKML is optional if you already have a dedicated
> platform-driver-x86 maillist.
Nope, LKML is never optional. All
2016-09-29 7:36 GMT+08:00 Darren Hart :
> +LKML
>
> Axel, please always include LKML on any patch.
I thought +LKML is optional if you already have a dedicated
platform-driver-x86 maillist.
2016-09-29 7:36 GMT+08:00 Darren Hart :
> +LKML
>
> Axel, please always include LKML on any patch.
I thought +LKML is optional if you already have a dedicated
platform-driver-x86 maillist.
+LKML
Axel, please always include LKML on any patch.
Qipeng, any concerns?
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:54:08AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> Use platform_device_register_full() instead of open-coded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c |
+LKML
Axel, please always include LKML on any patch.
Qipeng, any concerns?
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:54:08AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> Use platform_device_register_full() instead of open-coded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c | 110
>
8 matches
Mail list logo