RE: [PATCH RFT] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Convert to use platform_device_register_full

2016-09-28 Thread Zha, Qipeng
It's good to me, thanks. >+LKML > >Axel, please always include LKML on any patch. > >Qipeng, any concerns? On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:54:08AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > Use platform_device_register_full() instead of open-coded. > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin > --- >

RE: [PATCH RFT] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Convert to use platform_device_register_full

2016-09-28 Thread Zha, Qipeng
It's good to me, thanks. >+LKML > >Axel, please always include LKML on any patch. > >Qipeng, any concerns? On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:54:08AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > Use platform_device_register_full() instead of open-coded. > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin > --- >

Re: [PATCH RFT] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Convert to use platform_device_register_full

2016-09-28 Thread Darren Hart
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:59:55AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > 2016-09-29 7:36 GMT+08:00 Darren Hart : > > +LKML > > > > Axel, please always include LKML on any patch. > > I thought +LKML is optional if you already have a dedicated > platform-driver-x86 maillist. Nope, LKML

Re: [PATCH RFT] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Convert to use platform_device_register_full

2016-09-28 Thread Darren Hart
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:59:55AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > 2016-09-29 7:36 GMT+08:00 Darren Hart : > > +LKML > > > > Axel, please always include LKML on any patch. > > I thought +LKML is optional if you already have a dedicated > platform-driver-x86 maillist. Nope, LKML is never optional. All

Re: [PATCH RFT] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Convert to use platform_device_register_full

2016-09-28 Thread Axel Lin
2016-09-29 7:36 GMT+08:00 Darren Hart : > +LKML > > Axel, please always include LKML on any patch. I thought +LKML is optional if you already have a dedicated platform-driver-x86 maillist.

Re: [PATCH RFT] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Convert to use platform_device_register_full

2016-09-28 Thread Axel Lin
2016-09-29 7:36 GMT+08:00 Darren Hart : > +LKML > > Axel, please always include LKML on any patch. I thought +LKML is optional if you already have a dedicated platform-driver-x86 maillist.

Re: [PATCH RFT] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Convert to use platform_device_register_full

2016-09-28 Thread Darren Hart
+LKML Axel, please always include LKML on any patch. Qipeng, any concerns? On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:54:08AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > Use platform_device_register_full() instead of open-coded. > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin > --- > drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c |

Re: [PATCH RFT] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Convert to use platform_device_register_full

2016-09-28 Thread Darren Hart
+LKML Axel, please always include LKML on any patch. Qipeng, any concerns? On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:54:08AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > Use platform_device_register_full() instead of open-coded. > > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin > --- > drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c | 110 >