Re: [PATCH RFT 2/2] gpio: gpio-pch: Use spinlock for register access protection

2012-08-14 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Axel Lin  wrote:

> gpio_chip.can_sleep is 0, but current code uses mutex in pch_gpio_set
> pch_gpio_get and pch_gpio_direction_input functions.
> Thus those functions are not callable from interrupt context.
> This patch converts mutex into spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin 

Applied to my devel branch for the next merge window...

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH RFT 2/2] gpio: gpio-pch: Use spinlock for register access protection

2012-08-14 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Axel Lin axel@gmail.com wrote:

 gpio_chip.can_sleep is 0, but current code uses mutex in pch_gpio_set
 pch_gpio_get and pch_gpio_direction_input functions.
 Thus those functions are not callable from interrupt context.
 This patch converts mutex into spinlock.

 Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel@gmail.com

Applied to my devel branch for the next merge window...

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH RFT 2/2] gpio: gpio-pch: Use spinlock for register access protection

2012-08-13 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Axel Lin  wrote:

> gpio_chip.can_sleep is 0, but current code uses mutex in pch_gpio_set
> pch_gpio_get and pch_gpio_direction_input functions.
> Thus those functions are not callable from interrupt context.
> This patch converts mutex into spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin 

Same with this, yell or I'll apply.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: [PATCH RFT 2/2] gpio: gpio-pch: Use spinlock for register access protection

2012-08-13 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Axel Lin axel@gmail.com wrote:

 gpio_chip.can_sleep is 0, but current code uses mutex in pch_gpio_set
 pch_gpio_get and pch_gpio_direction_input functions.
 Thus those functions are not callable from interrupt context.
 This patch converts mutex into spinlock.

 Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel@gmail.com

Same with this, yell or I'll apply.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH RFT 2/2] gpio: gpio-pch: Use spinlock for register access protection

2012-07-28 Thread Axel Lin
gpio_chip.can_sleep is 0, but current code uses mutex in pch_gpio_set
pch_gpio_get and pch_gpio_direction_input functions.
Thus those functions are not callable from interrupt context.
This patch converts mutex into spinlock.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin 
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c |   22 ++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
index 139ad3e..4ad0c4f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
@@ -92,9 +92,7 @@ struct pch_gpio_reg_data {
  * @lock:  Used for register access protection
  * @irq_base:  Save base of IRQ number for interrupt
  * @ioh:   IOH ID
- * @spinlock:  Used for register access protection in
- * interrupt context pch_irq_mask,
- * pch_irq_unmask and pch_irq_type;
+ * @spinlock:  Used for register access protection
  */
 struct pch_gpio {
void __iomem *base;
@@ -102,7 +100,6 @@ struct pch_gpio {
struct device *dev;
struct gpio_chip gpio;
struct pch_gpio_reg_data pch_gpio_reg;
-   struct mutex lock;
int irq_base;
enum pch_type_t ioh;
spinlock_t spinlock;
@@ -112,8 +109,9 @@ static void pch_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned 
nr, int val)
 {
u32 reg_val;
struct pch_gpio *chip = container_of(gpio, struct pch_gpio, gpio);
+   unsigned long flags;
 
-   mutex_lock(>lock);
+   spin_lock_irqsave(>spinlock, flags);
reg_val = ioread32(>reg->po);
if (val)
reg_val |= (1 << nr);
@@ -121,7 +119,7 @@ static void pch_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned 
nr, int val)
reg_val &= ~(1 << nr);
 
iowrite32(reg_val, >reg->po);
-   mutex_unlock(>lock);
+   spin_unlock_irqrestore(>spinlock, flags);
 }
 
 static int pch_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned nr)
@@ -137,8 +135,9 @@ static int pch_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip 
*gpio, unsigned nr,
struct pch_gpio *chip = container_of(gpio, struct pch_gpio, gpio);
u32 pm;
u32 reg_val;
+   unsigned long flags;
 
-   mutex_lock(>lock);
+   spin_lock_irqsave(>spinlock, flags);
pm = ioread32(>reg->pm) & ((1 << gpio_pins[chip->ioh]) - 1);
pm |= (1 << nr);
iowrite32(pm, >reg->pm);
@@ -149,8 +148,7 @@ static int pch_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip 
*gpio, unsigned nr,
else
reg_val &= ~(1 << nr);
iowrite32(reg_val, >reg->po);
-
-   mutex_unlock(>lock);
+   spin_unlock_irqrestore(>spinlock, flags);
 
return 0;
 }
@@ -159,12 +157,13 @@ static int pch_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip 
*gpio, unsigned nr)
 {
struct pch_gpio *chip = container_of(gpio, struct pch_gpio, gpio);
u32 pm;
+   unsigned long flags;
 
-   mutex_lock(>lock);
+   spin_lock_irqsave(>spinlock, flags);
pm = ioread32(>reg->pm) & ((1 << gpio_pins[chip->ioh]) - 1);
pm &= ~(1 << nr);
iowrite32(pm, >reg->pm);
-   mutex_unlock(>lock);
+   spin_unlock_irqrestore(>spinlock, flags);
 
return 0;
 }
@@ -387,7 +386,6 @@ static int __devinit pch_gpio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 
chip->reg = chip->base;
pci_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
-   mutex_init(>lock);
spin_lock_init(>spinlock);
pch_gpio_setup(chip);
ret = gpiochip_add(>gpio);
-- 
1.7.9.5



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


[PATCH RFT 2/2] gpio: gpio-pch: Use spinlock for register access protection

2012-07-28 Thread Axel Lin
gpio_chip.can_sleep is 0, but current code uses mutex in pch_gpio_set
pch_gpio_get and pch_gpio_direction_input functions.
Thus those functions are not callable from interrupt context.
This patch converts mutex into spinlock.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel@gmail.com
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c |   22 ++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
index 139ad3e..4ad0c4f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
@@ -92,9 +92,7 @@ struct pch_gpio_reg_data {
  * @lock:  Used for register access protection
  * @irq_base:  Save base of IRQ number for interrupt
  * @ioh:   IOH ID
- * @spinlock:  Used for register access protection in
- * interrupt context pch_irq_mask,
- * pch_irq_unmask and pch_irq_type;
+ * @spinlock:  Used for register access protection
  */
 struct pch_gpio {
void __iomem *base;
@@ -102,7 +100,6 @@ struct pch_gpio {
struct device *dev;
struct gpio_chip gpio;
struct pch_gpio_reg_data pch_gpio_reg;
-   struct mutex lock;
int irq_base;
enum pch_type_t ioh;
spinlock_t spinlock;
@@ -112,8 +109,9 @@ static void pch_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned 
nr, int val)
 {
u32 reg_val;
struct pch_gpio *chip = container_of(gpio, struct pch_gpio, gpio);
+   unsigned long flags;
 
-   mutex_lock(chip-lock);
+   spin_lock_irqsave(chip-spinlock, flags);
reg_val = ioread32(chip-reg-po);
if (val)
reg_val |= (1  nr);
@@ -121,7 +119,7 @@ static void pch_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned 
nr, int val)
reg_val = ~(1  nr);
 
iowrite32(reg_val, chip-reg-po);
-   mutex_unlock(chip-lock);
+   spin_unlock_irqrestore(chip-spinlock, flags);
 }
 
 static int pch_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned nr)
@@ -137,8 +135,9 @@ static int pch_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip 
*gpio, unsigned nr,
struct pch_gpio *chip = container_of(gpio, struct pch_gpio, gpio);
u32 pm;
u32 reg_val;
+   unsigned long flags;
 
-   mutex_lock(chip-lock);
+   spin_lock_irqsave(chip-spinlock, flags);
pm = ioread32(chip-reg-pm)  ((1  gpio_pins[chip-ioh]) - 1);
pm |= (1  nr);
iowrite32(pm, chip-reg-pm);
@@ -149,8 +148,7 @@ static int pch_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip 
*gpio, unsigned nr,
else
reg_val = ~(1  nr);
iowrite32(reg_val, chip-reg-po);
-
-   mutex_unlock(chip-lock);
+   spin_unlock_irqrestore(chip-spinlock, flags);
 
return 0;
 }
@@ -159,12 +157,13 @@ static int pch_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip 
*gpio, unsigned nr)
 {
struct pch_gpio *chip = container_of(gpio, struct pch_gpio, gpio);
u32 pm;
+   unsigned long flags;
 
-   mutex_lock(chip-lock);
+   spin_lock_irqsave(chip-spinlock, flags);
pm = ioread32(chip-reg-pm)  ((1  gpio_pins[chip-ioh]) - 1);
pm = ~(1  nr);
iowrite32(pm, chip-reg-pm);
-   mutex_unlock(chip-lock);
+   spin_unlock_irqrestore(chip-spinlock, flags);
 
return 0;
 }
@@ -387,7 +386,6 @@ static int __devinit pch_gpio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 
chip-reg = chip-base;
pci_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
-   mutex_init(chip-lock);
spin_lock_init(chip-spinlock);
pch_gpio_setup(chip);
ret = gpiochip_add(chip-gpio);
-- 
1.7.9.5



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/