[PATCH RT 06/10] net: add a lock around icmp_sk()

3.14.79-rt85-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior It looks like the this_cpu_ptr() access in icmp_sk() is protected with local_bh_disable(). To avoid missing serialization in -RT I

[PATCH RT 06/10] net: add a lock around icmp_sk()

3.14.79-rt85-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior It looks like the this_cpu_ptr() access in icmp_sk() is protected with local_bh_disable(). To avoid missing serialization in -RT I am adding here a local

[PATCH RT 06/10] net: add a lock around icmp_sk()

3.18.42-rt45-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior It looks like the this_cpu_ptr() access in icmp_sk() is protected with local_bh_disable(). To avoid missing serialization in -RT I

[PATCH RT 06/10] net: add a lock around icmp_sk()

3.18.42-rt45-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior It looks like the this_cpu_ptr() access in icmp_sk() is protected with local_bh_disable(). To avoid missing serialization in -RT I am adding here a local

[PATCH RT 06/10] net: add a lock around icmp_sk()

4.1.33-rt38-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior It looks like the this_cpu_ptr() access in icmp_sk() is protected with local_bh_disable(). To avoid missing serialization in -RT I am

[PATCH RT 06/10] net: add a lock around icmp_sk()

4.1.33-rt38-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior It looks like the this_cpu_ptr() access in icmp_sk() is protected with local_bh_disable(). To avoid missing serialization in -RT I am adding here a local

[PATCH RT 06/10] net: add a lock around icmp_sk()

4.4.21-rt31-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior It looks like the this_cpu_ptr() access in icmp_sk() is protected with local_bh_disable(). To avoid missing serialization in -RT I am

[PATCH RT 06/10] net: add a lock around icmp_sk()

4.4.21-rt31-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior It looks like the this_cpu_ptr() access in icmp_sk() is protected with local_bh_disable(). To avoid missing serialization in -RT I am adding here a local