On a separate note, I want to thank everyone that helped with this
issue, especially Eric and Thomas, to and Steven and Thomas for
schooling me on the changelog extraction. This problem was a big one
for us that we were struggling to understand. All the help is greatly
appreciated.
Thanks,
Pete
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Peter LaDow wrote:
> I'm have a setup running 3.0.48-rt72. It's been running about 8 hours
> so far, and tomorrow I'll know if there's been any problems. I'm
> confident things will be fine tomorrow, and at that time I'll be glad
> to attach a Tested-by tag.
Ok.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Peter LaDow pet...@gocougs.wsu.edu wrote:
I'm have a setup running 3.0.48-rt72. It's been running about 8 hours
so far, and tomorrow I'll know if there's been any problems. I'm
confident things will be fine tomorrow, and at that time I'll be glad
to attach a
On a separate note, I want to thank everyone that helped with this
issue, especially Eric and Thomas, to and Steven and Thomas for
schooling me on the changelog extraction. This problem was a big one
for us that we were struggling to understand. All the help is greatly
appreciated.
Thanks,
Pete
> git log v3.0.36-rt58..3.0.48-rt72
>
> That's what a source version control system is designed for AFAICT
Thanks for the tip. I (naively) presumed there were published
changelogs and was looking for them. Nor did I know the git logs were
limited to releases, and didn't look there because I
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner
>
> The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
> local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
> that and needs explicit serialization here.
>
> Reported-by: Peter LaDow
>
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Peter LaDow wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Cough. You are missing a boat load of crucial fixes. There is a damned
> > good reason why 3.0.stable got 12 updates and the -rt version 14.
>
> I don't doubt there are. But we've only
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 15:30 -0700, Peter LaDow wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Cough. You are missing a boat load of crucial fixes. There is a damned
> > good reason why 3.0.stable got 12 updates and the -rt version 14.
>
> I don't doubt there are. But we've
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Cough. You are missing a boat load of crucial fixes. There is a damned
> good reason why 3.0.stable got 12 updates and the -rt version 14.
I don't doubt there are. But we've only experienced one problem
between 3.0.36-rt58 and
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Peter LaDow wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner
> >
> > The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
> > local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
> > that and needs explicit
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Peter LaDow wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
Cough. You are missing a boat load of crucial fixes. There is a damned
good reason why 3.0.stable got 12 updates and the -rt version 14.
I don't doubt there are. But we've only experienced one problem
between 3.0.36-rt58
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 15:30 -0700, Peter LaDow wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
Cough. You are missing a boat load of crucial fixes. There is a damned
good reason why 3.0.stable got 12 updates and the -rt version 14.
I don't doubt there are.
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Peter LaDow wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
Cough. You are missing a boat load of crucial fixes. There is a damned
good reason why 3.0.stable got 12 updates and the -rt version 14.
I don't doubt there are. But we've
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
that and needs explicit serialization here.
git log v3.0.36-rt58..3.0.48-rt72
That's what a source version control system is designed for AFAICT
Thanks for the tip. I (naively) presumed there were published
changelogs and was looking for them. Nor did I know the git logs were
limited to releases, and didn't look there because I feared
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner
>
> The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
> local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
> that and needs explicit serialization here.
>
> Reported-by: Peter LaDow
>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
that and needs explicit serialization here.
From: Thomas Gleixner
The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
that and needs explicit serialization here.
Reported-by: Peter LaDow
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: stable...@vger.kernel.org
---
From: Thomas Gleixner
The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
that and needs explicit serialization here.
Reported-by: Peter LaDow
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: stable...@vger.kernel.org
---
From: Thomas Gleixner
The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
that and needs explicit serialization here.
Reported-by: Peter LaDow
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: stable...@vger.kernel.org
---
From: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
that and needs explicit serialization here.
Reported-by: Peter LaDow pet...@gocougs.wsu.edu
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
From: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
that and needs explicit serialization here.
Reported-by: Peter LaDow pet...@gocougs.wsu.edu
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
From: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
that and needs explicit serialization here.
Reported-by: Peter LaDow pet...@gocougs.wsu.edu
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
24 matches
Mail list logo
