Re: [PATCH V2] regulator: dbx500: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()

2014-03-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:26:17AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: > For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts() > instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch > warning. Applied, thanks, but please in future send incremental fixes for already applied patches.

Re: [PATCH V2] regulator: dbx500: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()

2014-03-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:26:17AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch warning. Applied, thanks, but please in future send incremental fixes for already applied patches.

[PATCH V2] regulator: dbx500: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()

2014-03-18 Thread Jingoo Han
For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch warning. WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han --- Changes since v1: - Removed unnecessary seq_puts() in

[PATCH V2] regulator: dbx500: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()

2014-03-18 Thread Jingoo Han
For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch warning. WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com --- Changes since v1: - Removed unnecessary seq_puts() in