Re: [PATCH V2 1/6] stm class: Add ioctl get_options interface

2016-02-05 Thread Alexander Shishkin
Chunyan Zhang writes: > There is already an interface of set_options, but no get_options yet. > Before setting any options, one would may want to see the current > status of that option by means of get_options interface. This > interface has been used in CoreSight STM driver. > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH V2 1/6] stm class: Add ioctl get_options interface

2016-02-05 Thread Alexander Shishkin
Chunyan Zhang writes: > There is already an interface of set_options, but no get_options yet. > Before setting any options, one would may want to see the current > status of that option by means of get_options interface. This > interface has been used in CoreSight STM

[PATCH V2 1/6] stm class: Add ioctl get_options interface

2016-02-03 Thread Chunyan Zhang
There is already an interface of set_options, but no get_options yet. Before setting any options, one would may want to see the current status of that option by means of get_options interface. This interface has been used in CoreSight STM driver. Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang ---

[PATCH V2 1/6] stm class: Add ioctl get_options interface

2016-02-03 Thread Chunyan Zhang
There is already an interface of set_options, but no get_options yet. Before setting any options, one would may want to see the current status of that option by means of get_options interface. This interface has been used in CoreSight STM driver. Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang