Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] xen: scsiback: add LUN of restored domain

2015-03-16 Thread David Vrabel
On 17/02/15 07:02, Juergen Gross wrote: > When a xen domain is being restored the LUN state of a pvscsi device > is "Connected" and not "Initialising" as in case of attaching a new > pvscsi LUN. > > This must be taken into account when adding a new pvscsi device for > a domain as otherwise the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] xen: scsiback: add LUN of restored domain

2015-03-16 Thread David Vrabel
On 17/02/15 07:02, Juergen Gross wrote: When a xen domain is being restored the LUN state of a pvscsi device is Connected and not Initialising as in case of attaching a new pvscsi LUN. This must be taken into account when adding a new pvscsi device for a domain as otherwise the pvscsi LUN

Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] xen: scsiback: add LUN of restored domain

2015-02-24 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 02/24/2015 01:06 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: On 02/18/2015 06:02 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 02/17/2015 02:02 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: When a xen domain is being restored the LUN state of a pvscsi device is "Connected" and not "Initialising" as in case of attaching a new pvscsi LUN. This

Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] xen: scsiback: add LUN of restored domain

2015-02-24 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 02/24/2015 01:06 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: On 02/18/2015 06:02 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 02/17/2015 02:02 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: When a xen domain is being restored the LUN state of a pvscsi device is Connected and not Initialising as in case of attaching a new pvscsi LUN. This must

Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] xen: scsiback: add LUN of restored domain

2015-02-23 Thread Juergen Gross
On 02/18/2015 06:02 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 02/17/2015 02:02 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: When a xen domain is being restored the LUN state of a pvscsi device is "Connected" and not "Initialising" as in case of attaching a new pvscsi LUN. This must be taken into account when adding a new

Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] xen: scsiback: add LUN of restored domain

2015-02-23 Thread Juergen Gross
On 02/18/2015 06:02 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 02/17/2015 02:02 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: When a xen domain is being restored the LUN state of a pvscsi device is Connected and not Initialising as in case of attaching a new pvscsi LUN. This must be taken into account when adding a new pvscsi

Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] xen: scsiback: add LUN of restored domain

2015-02-18 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 02/17/2015 02:02 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: When a xen domain is being restored the LUN state of a pvscsi device is "Connected" and not "Initialising" as in case of attaching a new pvscsi LUN. This must be taken into account when adding a new pvscsi device for a domain as otherwise the pvscsi

Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] xen: scsiback: add LUN of restored domain

2015-02-18 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 02/17/2015 02:02 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: When a xen domain is being restored the LUN state of a pvscsi device is Connected and not Initialising as in case of attaching a new pvscsi LUN. This must be taken into account when adding a new pvscsi device for a domain as otherwise the pvscsi LUN

[PATCH V2 2/3] xen: scsiback: add LUN of restored domain

2015-02-16 Thread Juergen Gross
When a xen domain is being restored the LUN state of a pvscsi device is "Connected" and not "Initialising" as in case of attaching a new pvscsi LUN. This must be taken into account when adding a new pvscsi device for a domain as otherwise the pvscsi LUN won't be connected to the SCSI target

[PATCH V2 2/3] xen: scsiback: add LUN of restored domain

2015-02-16 Thread Juergen Gross
When a xen domain is being restored the LUN state of a pvscsi device is Connected and not Initialising as in case of attaching a new pvscsi LUN. This must be taken into account when adding a new pvscsi device for a domain as otherwise the pvscsi LUN won't be connected to the SCSI target