On 08-09-15, 02:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > static inline unsigned int get_freq_target(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
> >struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > {
> > @@ -119,12 +132,14 @@ static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block
> > *nb,
On Monday, July 27, 2015 05:58:07 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Conservative governor has its own 'enable' field to check if
> conservative governor is used for a CPU or not
>
> This can be checked by policy->governor with 'cpufreq_gov_conservative'
> and so this field can be dropped.
>
> Because its
On 08-09-15, 02:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > static inline unsigned int get_freq_target(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
> >struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > {
> > @@ -119,12 +132,14 @@ static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block
> > *nb,
On Monday, July 27, 2015 05:58:07 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Conservative governor has its own 'enable' field to check if
> conservative governor is used for a CPU or not
>
> This can be checked by policy->governor with 'cpufreq_gov_conservative'
> and so this field can be dropped.
>
> Because its
Conservative governor has its own 'enable' field to check if
conservative governor is used for a CPU or not
This can be checked by policy->governor with 'cpufreq_gov_conservative'
and so this field can be dropped.
Because its not guaranteed that dbs_info->cdbs.shared will a valid
pointer for all
Conservative governor has its own 'enable' field to check if
conservative governor is used for a CPU or not
This can be checked by policy-governor with 'cpufreq_gov_conservative'
and so this field can be dropped.
Because its not guaranteed that dbs_info-cdbs.shared will a valid
pointer for all
6 matches
Mail list logo
