On 25-10-16, 13:26, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> For things like AVS we'll probably want to do that, although it's
> sort of funny because replacing RCU with rw-locks is the opposite
> direction most people go.
Yes, that would be very funny :)
> With AVS we would be updating the
> voltage(s) in use for
On 10/25, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24-10-16, 16:14, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 10/20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > Pass the entire supply structure instead of all of its fields.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
> > > ---
> >
> > This patch should be combined with the previous one.
>
> I thi
On 24-10-16, 16:14, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Pass the entire supply structure instead of all of its fields.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
> > ---
>
> This patch should be combined with the previous one.
I think it is a fair to do this separately as this is a
On 10/20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Pass the entire supply structure instead of all of its fields.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
> ---
This patch should be combined with the previous one. I'm still
not sure if it even makes sense to do this though. Do we really
have to make duplicate "OPP snapshot
Pass the entire supply structure instead of all of its fields.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
drivers/base/power/opp/core.c | 44 +--
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/co
5 matches
Mail list logo