On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Kent Yoder wrote:
> > > James did accept my pull request, so these are already in
> > > security-next...
> >
> > For the driver itself, it's not a big issue (though I did found issue
> > while reviewing it so it will need another round of updates). For the
> > code that
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Kent Yoder wrote:
James did accept my pull request, so these are already in
security-next...
For the driver itself, it's not a big issue (though I did found issue
while reviewing it so it will need another round of updates). For the
code that changes
> > James did accept my pull request, so these are already in
> > security-next...
>
> For the driver itself, it's not a big issue (though I did found issue
> while reviewing it so it will need another round of updates). For the
> code that changes arch/powerpc, especially prom_init.c, that
James did accept my pull request, so these are already in
security-next...
For the driver itself, it's not a big issue (though I did found issue
while reviewing it so it will need another round of updates). For the
code that changes arch/powerpc, especially prom_init.c, that stuff must
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:46 -0500, Kent Yoder wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:40:07PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 16:42 -0500, Kent Yoder wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:17:43PM -0500, Ashley Lai wrote:
> > > > This patch adds a new device driver to
Hi Ben.,
Thank you so much for the comments. Please see my response below.
> > > + */
> > > +static int tpm_ibmvtpm_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm;
> > > + u16 len;
> > > +
> > > + ibmvtpm = (struct ibmvtpm_dev
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:40:07PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 16:42 -0500, Kent Yoder wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:17:43PM -0500, Ashley Lai wrote:
> > > This patch adds a new device driver to support IBM virtual TPM
> > > (vTPM) for PPC64. IBM vTPM is
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:40:07PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 16:42 -0500, Kent Yoder wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:17:43PM -0500, Ashley Lai wrote:
This patch adds a new device driver to support IBM virtual TPM
(vTPM) for PPC64. IBM vTPM is supported
Hi Ben.,
Thank you so much for the comments. Please see my response below.
+ */
+static int tpm_ibmvtpm_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
+{
+ struct ibmvtpm_dev *ibmvtpm;
+ u16 len;
+
+ ibmvtpm = (struct ibmvtpm_dev *)chip-vendor.data;
+
+ if
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:46 -0500, Kent Yoder wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:40:07PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 16:42 -0500, Kent Yoder wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:17:43PM -0500, Ashley Lai wrote:
This patch adds a new device driver to support IBM
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 16:42 -0500, Kent Yoder wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:17:43PM -0500, Ashley Lai wrote:
> > This patch adds a new device driver to support IBM virtual TPM
> > (vTPM) for PPC64. IBM vTPM is supported through the adjunct
> > partition with firmware release 740 or higher.
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 16:42 -0500, Kent Yoder wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:17:43PM -0500, Ashley Lai wrote:
This patch adds a new device driver to support IBM virtual TPM
(vTPM) for PPC64. IBM vTPM is supported through the adjunct
partition with firmware release 740 or higher. With
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:17:43PM -0500, Ashley Lai wrote:
> This patch adds a new device driver to support IBM virtual TPM
> (vTPM) for PPC64. IBM vTPM is supported through the adjunct
> partition with firmware release 740 or higher. With vTPM
> support, each lpar is able to have its own vTPM
This patch adds a new device driver to support IBM virtual TPM
(vTPM) for PPC64. IBM vTPM is supported through the adjunct
partition with firmware release 740 or higher. With vTPM
support, each lpar is able to have its own vTPM without the
physical TPM hardware.
This driver provides TPM
This patch adds a new device driver to support IBM virtual TPM
(vTPM) for PPC64. IBM vTPM is supported through the adjunct
partition with firmware release 740 or higher. With vTPM
support, each lpar is able to have its own vTPM without the
physical TPM hardware.
This driver provides TPM
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:17:43PM -0500, Ashley Lai wrote:
This patch adds a new device driver to support IBM virtual TPM
(vTPM) for PPC64. IBM vTPM is supported through the adjunct
partition with firmware release 740 or higher. With vTPM
support, each lpar is able to have its own vTPM
This patch adds a new device driver to support IBM virtual TPM
(vTPM) for PPC64. IBM vTPM is supported through the adjunct
partition with firmware release 740 or higher. With vTPM
support, each lpar is able to have its own vTPM without the
physical TPM hardware.
This driver provides TPM
This patch adds a new device driver to support IBM virtual TPM
(vTPM) for PPC64. IBM vTPM is supported through the adjunct
partition with firmware release 740 or higher. With vTPM
support, each lpar is able to have its own vTPM without the
physical TPM hardware.
This driver provides TPM
18 matches
Mail list logo