On 10/18/2016 7:05 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I think you should squash patches 2 & 3 and not bother with trying to
> make this a revert followed by a fix. Squashing them makes the git
> history much easier to follow, plus you don't have to deal with the
> headache of ensuring the intermediate sta
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 12:31:06AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The SCI function was removed in two steps (first refactor and then remove).
> This patch does the revert in one step.
>
> The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
> refactored the original code so that SCI
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The SCI function was removed in two steps (first refactor and then remove).
> This patch does the revert in one step.
"The SCI penalize function was removed in two steps (first refactor
and then remove) and these changes are reverted here in on
The SCI function was removed in two steps (first refactor and then remove).
This patch does the revert in one step.
The commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
refactored the original code so that SCI penalty is calculated dynamically
by the time get_penalty function is
4 matches
Mail list logo
