On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:28:50PM +, Vinayak Kale wrote:
>> In Will's existing code, I think he was taking care of 'no IRQ' case
>> by comparing pmu_device->num_resources. Do you think this is not
>> enough and we must enforce the check
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:28:50PM +, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> In Will's existing code, I think he was taking care of 'no IRQ' case
> by comparing pmu_device->num_resources. Do you think this is not
> enough and we must enforce the check after each platform_get_irq()?
> Existing driver code
Hi Marc,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> [dropped patc...@apm.com]
>
> Vinayak,
>
> Please keep reviewers on CC, as it makes easier to track the changes.
Sure, will do.
>
> On 20/11/13 11:13, Vinayak Kale wrote:
>> Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is
[dropped patc...@apm.com]
Vinayak,
Please keep reviewers on CC, as it makes easier to track the changes.
On 20/11/13 11:13, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale
> Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan
> ---
>
Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu.
Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale
Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 108 ++--
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu.
Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale vk...@apm.com
Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan tp...@apm.com
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 108 ++--
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git
[dropped patc...@apm.com]
Vinayak,
Please keep reviewers on CC, as it makes easier to track the changes.
On 20/11/13 11:13, Vinayak Kale wrote:
Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu.
Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale vk...@apm.com
Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan tp...@apm.com
Hi Marc,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
[dropped patc...@apm.com]
Vinayak,
Please keep reviewers on CC, as it makes easier to track the changes.
Sure, will do.
On 20/11/13 11:13, Vinayak Kale wrote:
Add support for irq registration when pmu
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:28:50PM +, Vinayak Kale wrote:
In Will's existing code, I think he was taking care of 'no IRQ' case
by comparing pmu_device-num_resources. Do you think this is not
enough and we must enforce the check after each platform_get_irq()?
Existing driver code snippet as
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:28:50PM +, Vinayak Kale wrote:
In Will's existing code, I think he was taking care of 'no IRQ' case
by comparing pmu_device-num_resources. Do you think this is not
enough and we must enforce
10 matches
Mail list logo